Category: candidates

  • Candidates

    Official List

    As of August 22, 2022, the official list of certified candidates for municipal office in Prince Edward County includes ( * denotes incumbent ):

    Mayor (1 office)

    Candidate Name Qualifying Address Telephone Email Website/Social Media
    Steve FERGUSON* Mobile:
    613-827-7174
    stevefergusonpec@kos.net
    Dianne O’BRIEN 965 County Rd 23 Home:
    613-967-1479
    Mobile:
    613-242-0477
    ob.dianne@gmail.com Facebook
    Twitter
    Kyle Douglas MAYNE 17-343 County Road 22 Mobile:
    613-920-6422
    Kyleformayor61@hotmail.com
    Terry SHORTT Mobile:
    613-391-7069
    tshortt55@gmail.com

    Ward 1 – Picton (2 offices)

    Candidate Name Qualifying Address Telephone Email Website/Social Media
    Phil ADIE 613-817-9669 Phil80forcouncil@gmail.com Facebook
    Instagram
    Jane LESSLIE Mobile:
    416-409-9277
    jane.lesslie@yahoo.com Twitter
    Kate MACNAUGHTON* Mobile:
    613-921-1200
    kateforcouncil2018@gmail.com
    Peter MORCH 89 King Street Mobile:
    613-847-5992
    pecpete2022@gmail.com
    Phil ST-JEAN* 23 Stanley St Mobile:
    613-242-0478
    philstjean2022@outlook.com

    Ward 2 – Bloomfield/Hallowell (2 offices)

    Candidate Name Qualifying Address Telephone Email Website/Social Media
    Sarah MOFFATT Mobile:
    613-813-2361
    sarah.moffatt.pec@gmail.com Facebook
    Brad NIEMAN * 426 County Rd 10 Home:
    613-476-6320
    Mobile:
    613-561-0182
    bgnieman@hotmail.com
    Phil PRINZEN * 1176 Gilead Rd Home:
    613-399-3330
    Mobile:
    613-848-6877
    prinzhavenfarms@hotmail.com

    Ward 3 – Wellington (1 office)

    Candidate Name Qualifying Address Telephone Email Website/Social Media
    Jennifer COBB 222 Main Street, Wellington Mobile: 613-399-5222 jennifer.cobb@live.com
    Corey ENGELSDORFER 241 Burr Road Mobile:
    613-243-8868
    cengelsdorfer@gmail.com
    Heather NORLOCK Mobile:
    613-885-2113
    heather.norlock@hotmail.com

    Ward 4 – Ameliasburgh (3 offices)

    Candidate Name Qualifying Address Telephone Email Website/Social Media
    Paul BOYD Mobile:
    613-848-3320
    ponsemby@icloud.com
    Sam GROSSO 3038 County Rd 3 Mobile:
    416-876-2751
    sam@cadillaclounge.com Facebook
    Sam Grosso
    Janice
    MAYNARD *
    238 County Rd 29 Mobile:
    613-827-1201
    janicemaynard2014@gmail.com
    Roy PENNELL 1239 Salem Rd Mobile:
    613-969-8099
    4roypennell@gmail.com
    Bill TKACH 1259 County Rd 19 Mobile:
    613-222-6974
    BillyTk5@rogers.com

    Ward 5 – Athol (1 office)

    Candidate Name Qualifying Address Telephone Email Website/Social Media
    Sam BRANDENHORST Mobile:
    613-885-3245
    sambranderhorst@gmail.com
    Tom HARRISON tomharrisonpeccouncil@gmail.com Instagram
    Twitter
    Robert (Bob) ROGERS 843 County Road 18 Mobile:
    613-922-4293
    bobrogersward5@gmail.com
    Elis ZIEGLER Mobile:
    613-921-4059
    Eliszieglerforathol@gmail.com Elisziegler.ca
    Facebook
    Instagram

    Ward 6 – Sophiasburgh (1 office)

    Candidate Name Qualifying Address Telephone Email Website/Social Media
    Paul DRAKE 65 Inkerman Ave 613-438-6568 P_drake1@hotmail.com
    Bill ROBERTS * 2839 County Road 15 Home:
    613-476-3387
    wdroberts@hotmail.com

    Ward 7 – Hillier (1 office)

    Candidate Name Qualifying Address Telephone Email Website/Social Media
    Chris BRANEY 1521 Danforth Road cbraney41@hotmail.com
    Dee HAZELL 195 Partridge Hollow Road dee.hazell.pec@gmail.com
    Paul VANHAARLEM 3247 County Road 1 613-885-9534 paul.517@hotmail.com

    Ward 8 – North Marysburgh (1 office)

    Candidate Name Qualifying Address Telephone Email Website/Social Media
    David HARRISON 229 Point Pleasant Lane Mobile:
    613-847-7079
    davidharrisonfornm@gmail.com
    Ben THORNTON 24 Picton Main Street Mobile:
    613-846-0029
    benthorntonpec@gmail.com Facebook
    Instagram:
    @BenThorntonNorthMarysburgh

    Ward 9 – South Marysburgh (1 office)

    Candidate
    Name
    Qualifying Address Telephone Email Website/Social Media
    John HIRSCH * 2084 County Road 1 Mobile:
    613-846-0046
    pec.councillor.john@outlook.com
    Ryan KREUTZWISER 11306 Loyalist Parkway Mobile:
    613-922-7717
    Ryankreu2022@gmail.com

     

  • Summary of Candidate Responses to Invitation 1

    Invitation 1

    With the aim of increasing voter turnout in the upcoming municipal election, candidates for Mayor and Ward Councilor in Prince Edward County are being invited to share their thoughts on a wide range of issues once a week.

    Candidates received Invitation 1 on August 24, 2022 and were asked to share their thoughts by August 29, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on August 31, 2022.

    Candidate Responses 1

    The County’s official list of certified candidates includes 4 candidates for Mayor (1 office) and 29 candidates for Ward Councilor (13 offices in 9 Wards). Eight incumbents are seeking re-election, including the Mayor and 7 Councilors.

    Responses to Invitation 1 were received from 18 candidates overall (54.5%), including 2 candidates for Mayor (50%) and 16 candidates for Councilor (55.2%). Five incumbents (62.5%), including the Mayor and 4 Councilors (57.1%), responded. Other candidates showed an interest in the process and may join later.

    See also the candidates’ unredacted responses.

    Summary 1

    County residency

    Candidates were asked, “For how many years have you resided in the County?” Their responses are summarized in Table 1:

    Table 1. County residency.
    County residency Respondents Percent
    Under 10 yrs 3 16.7%
    10 to 19 yrs 3 16.7%
    20 to 29 yrs 4 22.2%
    30+ yrs 8 44.4%
    Total 18 100.0%

    Membership on municipal bodies

    Candidates were asked to identify their memberships on any body associated with the municipal government in the County during the previous and current terms of Council. We have grouped memberships into broader, related areas of responsibility and collapsed across previous and current terms of Council. Candidates’ memberships in these groups over this period are summarized in Table 2:

    Table 2. Membership on municipal bodies (Fall 2014 to present).
    1 “Environment” reflects membership on the Environmental Advisory Committee, Quinte Waste Solutions, and/or Quinte Conservation Executive Board. 2 “Heritage” reflects membership on the Heritage Advisory Committee, the Museum Advisory Committee, and/or the Cemetery Advisory Committee. 3 “Community & economic development” reflects membership on the Community & Economic Development Commmission and/or the Visit the County Destination Marketing and Management Board.
    Membership on municipal bodies Respondents Percent
    Environment 1 5 27.8%
    Heritage 2 5 27.8%
    Agriculture 4 22.2%
    Audit 4 22.2%
    Community & economic development 3 4 22.2%
    Recreation 4 22.2%
    Nominating 2 11.1%
    Traffic 2 11.1%
    Accessibility 1 5.6%
    Police 1 5.6%
    Social services 1 5.6%

    Volunteering in the County

    Candidates were asked to identify their memberships in not-for-profit, non-governmental organizations associated with the County during the current term of Council. Areas of volunteering most frequently identified by candidates are summarized in Table 3:

    Table 3. Areas of volunteering.
    Areas of volunteering  Respondents Percent
    Children & families 4 22.2%
    Agriculture 3 16.7%
    Food insecurity 3 16.7%
    Arts 2 11.1%
    Women 2 11.1%
    None 10 55.6%

    Tension between “old” and “new” residents

    Candidates were asked “How do you understand talk of tension between ‘old’ and ‘new’ residents in the County?” Four candidates (22.2%) found the question to be potentially divisive, a mere distraction, or had no comment. Four candidates (22.2%) hadn’t experienced this sort of tension in the County. Ten candidates (55.5%) shared their experiences and thoughts about it.

    Regardless of their responses to this question, candidates expressed nearly no concern that tension between ‘old’ and ‘new’ residents in the County influences Council’s agenda or decisions (Table 4).

    Table 4. Influence of any tension between “old” and “new” residents on Council.
    Tension influences Council’s agenda Respondents Percent
    Strongly disagree/disagree 7 38.9%
    Neither disagree or agree 8 44.4%
    Agree/strongly agree 1 5.6%
    NA 2 11.1%
    Tension influences Council’s decisions Respondents Percent
    Strongly disagree/disagree 8 44.4%
    Neither disagree or agree 7 38.9%
    Agree/strongly agree 1 5.6%
    NA 2 11.1%

    Many candidates had thoughts about the role they saw for themselves in addressing any tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County.