Author: PEC Buzz Admin

RSVPs

With the aim of increasing voter turnout in the upcoming municipal election, candidates for Mayor and Ward Councilor in Prince Edward County were invited to share their thoughts on a wide range of issues once a week.

Responses from candidates for Ward 1 – Picton are here:

• Responses to Invitation 8
• Accountability & transparency
• Responses to Invitation 7
• Responses to Invitation 6
• Responses to Invitation 5
• Responses to Invitation 4
• Responses to Invitation 3
• Responses to Invitation 2
• Responses to Invitation 1

Respondents

	Invitations
Candidates for Ward 1 – Picton (2 offices)	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Phil ADIE
Jane LESSLIE
Kate MACNAUGHTON
Peter MORCH
Phil ST-JEAN

Responses to Invitation 8

Candidates received Invitation 8 on October 5, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 17, 2022. Candidates who wanted their responses to be published before advance voting started were to forward them by October 12, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook beginning October 13, 2022.

Respondents

• Jane Lesslie

Jane Lesslie

1. Please share how you would enhance Council’s approach to public engagement.

Going door to door regarding an issue in my neighbourhood a few years ago reminded me how important it is to listen. People need to be heard and public officials need to be responsive and accountable.

Have Your Say is a great tool to have people provide input on public policy in the County. I admire how it is also being adapted for other purposes – eg. To identify and map invasive species in the County.

We still need two-way communication. I feel a sense of frustration that recommendations are reached, Council is to decide and people have to jam in their comments in 3 minutes at very formal Council meetings that really do not lend themselves to an exchange of ideas. I also think it leads to frustration in the Community. We need to have more subject specific townhalls on key issues so that communication can be two-way. For example, I am advocating that a small finance subcommittee be established to conduct a thorough analysis of our past, present and forecasted spending. The next step should be a presentation of the findings to the community by the people on this committee. This would be a chance to discuss the mix of spending, why it exists etc. The Ad Hoc Water Rates Committee should be restruck and do something similar.

As a councillor I would also hold regular “surgeries” (as they call them in the UK) where you meet with constituents one on one. And group town halls.

2. Please share why you’re running and why voters should support you in the municipal election.

I would be your full time Councillor. Picton is my full-time home. My experience as chair of the Environmental Advisory Committee to Council and serving as a volunteer at the County Food Depot during Covid, combined with my past work experience analyzing government finances, have given me plenty of ideas and inspired me to run. I believe my financial and economic background would be helpful skills at the Council horseshoe. And after more than two decades analyzing government finances, I came to understand that it wasn’t just a numbers game but how communities stacked up on their environmental, social and governance risks and strengths that led to sustainable societies. I want to work closely with the County Foundation who I believe are on the right track in this regard.

My priorities are:

1. Protecting our unique environment and strategies to address climate change. Working as chair of the EAC made me aware of the urgent decisions the County faces as we confront Climate change. The potential financial, economic, health and social costs can hit us hard. Climate change and other environmental risks are looming threats for a County with 800km of shoreline and a tourism industry reliant on it, where 25% of our economy is agriculture, where we are naturally drought prone, and where we have amazing but fragile environmental assets and where we have a larger older population who will feel the health impacts most acutely.
2. Diversifying our economy to encourage full time jobs in other sectors and year-round demand for our existing businesses thus expanding our tax base. Why not foster the green and blue businesses of tomorrow?
3. Affordable housing, strategies for primary health care and our young people are clear areas demanding attention. On healthcare we are in competition with other communities and we have to be among health care workers top choices given we are losing 10 family doctors to retirement between now and 2026. We need a closer working relationship with school trustees to help our high school students succeed and prepare for those jobs that our businesses are struggling to fill. Grants for skills upgrading for those already living here would help – eg. For local nurses who want to become nurse practioners.

Fact based decision, not reinventing the wheel and adopting best practices from other communities are the principles that guide me. I am committed to being accountable, approachable and available.

You can find more information at my website: www.janelesslie.ca

---

Back to top

Accountability & transparency

Three Invitations asked candidates to rate six proposals to enhance Council’s accountability and transparency:

• Invitation 4 – Additional conflicts of interest (2 proposals)
• Invitation 5 – Transparency and privacy (3 proposals)
• Invitation 7 – Recorded votes (1 proposal)

We have categorized candidates’ ratings of these proposals [Not in favour | Neither | In favour] below. Candidates were asked to explain their ratings and we encourage everyone to consider them too.

Table 1. Candidates’ ratings of proposals to enhance Council’s accountability and transparency.

Phil ADIE
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Jane LESSLIE
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Kate MACNAUGHTON
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Peter MORCH
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Phil ST-JEAN
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 7

Candidates received Invitation 7 on October 3, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 11, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on October 12, 2022.

Respondents

• Jane Lesslie

Jane Lesslie

1. For any one of [the nine themes covered in the 2022 VitalSigns Report], please outline a course of action that Council should consider to reinforce successes and/or address challenges identified in the 2022 VitalSigns Report.

Environment.

1. Develop a Climate Action Plan – and act on it- Our agriculture sector, tourism industry, the health of our older population; and our tax dollars are at serious risk from climate change.
2. Follow the Grey County Approach – We need to both Mitigate (reduce greenhouse gas emissions) and Adapt. Priority should be given to actions that do BOTH.
3. Set priorities – look for actions that give us the biggest bang for our tax buck.
4. A climate change lens should be applied to all policies, procedures and bylaws – to identify:
   1. risks
   2. funding support opportunities (eg. Green Municipal Fund)
   3. opportunities to introduce smarter processes.
5. Turn our Tree Policy into an enforceable Tree Bylaw and give it some teeth. There are plenty of sources of funding for trees – e.g. Highway of Heros Tree/Green Campaign (see my website www.janelesslie.ca or my facebook page for more info on the power of trees.
6. Our Wetlands are Workhorses – We establish environmental requirements for developments but neither the County nor Quinte Conservations have resources to verify that promised protection are implemented – this is a pantomime of protection.
7. Consolidate the Grass and Weeds and property standards bylaws. Environmental Advisory Committee and Agricultural Advisory Committee should collaborate to fight invasive species and noxious weeks. Stop promoting turf grass as the go-to option for lawns given its intense water demands, run off from pesticides and fertilizer and gas mower requirements, Encourage plant diversity to support biodiversity and pollinators.
8. Green (and Blue) our Planning process:
   • Encourage green building techniques (and support training in this growing job sector for local people through partnership with Loyalist College) and blue (greywater recycling) methods.
   • Change Quinte Conservation’s mandate for PEC so they can enforce our new 50 metre setback for wetlands
   • A new site alteration bylaw which includes limits on clearcutting and removal of natural habitats in the planning process.
   • We need a new bylaw on what constitutes a “complete development application”, and a checklist of what is required for Environmental Impact Studies (EIS) and Hydrogeological reports so all applicants are on a level playing field.
   • No more four rounds of EIS reports with Quinte Conservation – This is wasting PEC County Staff resources and times, Quinte Conservation’s limited resources and the applicants’ time – get it right at the get go.
   • For larger developments – get all key people around the table to ID what is needed at the outset to streamline the process and get to a yes or no faster – savings to everyone.

2. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following proposal: “Council should adopt a Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.”

Strongly agree.

3. Please explain your rating.

Councillors should be accountable for their decisions. And information should be maintained so that members of the community can easily access/track information in order to assess their councillors during elections. We should also include a note when people are absent for votes – know if your councillor has a pattern of ducking hard decisions.

4. Please share examples of how you’ve been trying to learn more about diversity, equity and inclusion. What have been the biggest changes in your thinking? How are you applying what you’ve learned in your work in the County?

I think the death of George Floyd in 2020 and the discovery of the graves of Indigenous children at former residential schools in the summer of 2021 in Canada both prompted me to ask myself if I really understood these issues. Talking with former colleagues who are people of colour after George Floyd’s horrific death really helped me to understand the extra hurdles and sadly outright aggression that was part of daily life for them. One very talented young colleague of East Indian background gave me a series of examples of encounters with police and the assumptions that were made about him before he had even opened his mouth to say a word.

Thanks to my work on the Environmental Advisory Committee I began gaining insight into the issues people of First Nations face through my fellow committee member, Nicole Storms, then the Environmental Supervisor for the Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte. One thing that struck me was Nicole’s comment that so often First Nations people will end up in meetings with the Provincial government or Municipalities and before she could tackle an issue she would have to educate them about established treaty rights which the Federal government was aware of but had made no effort to communicate to other levels of governments. This has really created still an extra hurdle in the work of reconciliation.

I would also like to see a youth council developed so that the next generation of voters – who will have to contend with our slow response to Climate Change – have the opportunity to comment on draft County policies. They would be our “Futurists” and keep us focused on the longer term. For example, I would like to hear their recommendations about how we can help improve circumstances for students from the LGBT and BIPOC communities in the County. To do well our students have to feel safe and comfortable so this is critical.

My former employer began delivering diversity, equity and inclusion training 10 years ago on a regular basis with the last few years focused on unconscious bias which opened my eyes. This training will enhance my analysis and decision making. Heather McGhee’s Book, The Sum of Us, which I highly recommend, has also contributed to my thoughts about how government policies may perpetuate division and throw up roadblocks. I’m hoping my memories of my experience as the only woman in the room during the early part of my career in finance will also help me to be empathetic.

I want to ensure all people have access to me to bring their concerns, issues and perspectives. By looking at County policies and procedures, by encouraging the same kind of DEI training for Municipal staff that I benefitted from and encouraging diversity in our hiring practices where provincial regulation permits.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 6

Candidates received Invitation 6 on September 23, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 3, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on October 5, 2022.

Respondents

None.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 5

Candidates received Invitation 5 on September 20, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 26, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 28, 2022.

Respondents

• Jane Lesslie

Jane Lesslie

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s 94 Calls to Action include calls to municipal governments that apply to County Council:

• to adopt and implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as the framework for reconciliation (CTA 43)
• to repudiate concepts used to justify European sovereignty over Indigenous peoples and lands, such as the Doctrine of Discovery and terra nullius, and to reform those laws, government policies, and litigation strategies that continue to rely on such concepts (CTA 47)
• to provide education to public servants on the history of Aboriginal peoples, including the history and legacy of residential schools, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Treaties and Aboriginal rights, Indigenous law, and Aboriginal-Crown relations (CTA 57)

1. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following:

“Council should adopt a Strategic Initiative to respond to Calls to Action 43, 47 and 57.”

Strongly agree.

2. Please explain your rating.

I was lucky to have Nicole Storms, then Environmental Supervisor with the Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte, as a technical advisor to the Environmental Advisory Committee which I chaired. One of the richest conversations I had with here was on the subject of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s recommendations and what had become of them. She noted that the federal government has left it up to the First Nations’ themselves to educate provincial and municipal governments about the treaty rights that First Nations’ peoples have, an example being the duty to consult. She would find herself in meetings to discuss issues with the provinces or municipalities only to discover they had no idea that these rights existed. The Municipality has a “Duty to Consult” with First Nations when it comes to developments touching shorelines and thus potential fishing rights. The Mohawks of Bay of Quinte have complained about our planning process and the very short turnaround times they are given by our Planning Department, inconsistent with their staff size and resources. This again is an area where we need to create a planning checklist template and the early round table consults on large projects that Brighton had adopted and that one of our committee members had been impressed with in her work with Lower Trent Conservation. More broadly, the County should seek out “coaches” such as Nicole to ensure both municipal staff and council have an understanding of where such obligations lie.

3. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following statements:

“The cost of maintaining a public register of requests for County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Strongly disagree.

“The cost of the routine disclosure of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Strongly disagree.

“The cost of the active dissemination of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Strongly disagree.

4. For any one of your ratings above, please describe your analysis of the different costs and benefits that lead to your conclusion (max. 500 words).

I side with former Washington Post editor Bob Woodward who has employed the phrase “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” Transparency lies at the heart of governance, government and democracy. At a time when trust in government is being attacked from so many angles we have to be vigilant about maintaining public trust. I have no doubt we could find volunteers with a technology background to assist our municipal government with such an initiative.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 4

Candidates received Invitation 4 on September 14, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 19, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 20, 2022.

Respondents

• Jane Lesslie

Jane Lesslie

1. Please identify and describe the general nature of any conflict of pecuniary interest – real or apparent, direct or indirect – that you would foresee needing to declare, given the sort of conflicts that have been disclosed by your predecessors in 2020-2022. [We later clarified the reference to 2020-2022 here. As the preamble re: “Pecuniary Conflicts of Interest” notes, these three years are the ones reported in the County’s online Annual Registries of members’ disclosoure of conflicts of interest.]

I have a licensed STA in my home – i.e. I rent out the lower level of my house in Picton that I live in full time. (I do think conflicts should delineate a whole home STA from other varieties.)

2A & 3. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.” Please elaborate.

Strongly agree

I believe these conflicts should be included as attachments to Council agendas when there are Items on the agenda relevant to a conflict that are under discussion in the interest of transparency and governance. Committee members – public and councillors – must be equally diligent in terms of declaring conflicts with similar treatment.

2B & 4. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.” Please elaborate.

Neither disagree or agree

I would require clarification as to where on the relationship line this would end? We have families who have been here for generations and thus are extended. Don’t want to them up in knots. What about non familial relationships? I would note that I have no family in the County so this has no immediate impact on me.

5. In the voter’s own words, please identify the most difficult-to-answer question that you’ve been asked in your campaign.

Tourism Management.

6. Please explain why this question was the most difficult-to-answer.

I recognize that tourism is both a blessing and a curse from the perspective of the community, that at times it can seem to undermine the quality of life we enjoy here. At the same time, I’m very concerned about the cost of living in the County and I know that service industry positions are not the best paying, particularly when they are seasonal. I would like to see no promotion of tourism in the summer but instead would like to encourage shoulder/off season tourism in order to support people’s jobs and incomes. But I also know the reaction of many will be “no more tourism, we have to have some part of the year where we are not feeling this pressure”. I do not believe we would see anywhere near the intensity in off seasons that we experience in summer so that is one mitigating factor. In addition, I want to see us encouraging non tourism business here in the County which would provide people with more income security and provide additional support for our existing businesses. I also think this should be done as a risk management measure given the risk we currently have from being so dependent on one industry in our economy. Witness Covid in 2020. I would like the County to lobby Queens Park to permit us to spend funds from the Municipal Accommodation tax supporting affordable housing as opposed to promoting tourism as the province dictates we must.

7. On October 21, 2020, Council voted unanimously to deny a rezoning application from Picton Terminals to bring in container and cruise ships. If presented with a similar vote today, how would you vote (deny or approve)? Why?

I would vote to deny this application for the following reasons:
1. It is inconsistent with the strategic goals of the County re: maintaining our rural and historical heritage and reducing the impacts of climate change – as well as our economy and our financial stability given the attendant risks.
2. It was incompatible with the then existing official plan or the then circulating draft official plan.
3. Through cruise ships and container ships the quality of our drinking water was at risk, as was our sport fishing industry. Similarly the community was not entitled to know/inspect the contents of containers thus our ability to identify risk was impeded.
4. The quality of environmental documents was poor and the proponent provided inadequate responses to peer review questions except to say they would “take care of it”. The proponent had a poor track record managing environmental risk that had already cost taxpayers considerably. We were asked to assume all of these risks for little economic upside -three permanent local jobs.

The Official Plan which came into effect in July 2021 will be eligible for amendment as of July 2023. We must ensure no amendments can be included which would permit this project to proceed. I would also like to better understand how planning staff came to recommend in favour of this project so we may review/improve our planning procedures to ensure this does not occur again.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 3

Candidates received Invitation 3 on September 7, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 12, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 14, 2022.

Respondents

• Jane Lesslie

Jane Lesslie

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following strategic initiatives:

Strategic Initiative	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
By-law and policy review
Downtown revitalization
Healthcare initiatives
Municipal Accommodation Tax
PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
Short-Term Accommodations
Tourism management
Understanding Growth and Water/wastewater infrastructure

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

My concern does not lie with the individual initiatives (thus my neutral rating on all of them) but the lack of joined up thinking! The question for each initiative is how does it further the strategic priorities, identified at the beginning? Only Tourism management identifies the strategic initiatives that it supports. To illustrate: As each bylaw is reviewed it should be tested against the seven strategic priorities – does it further them? And we need to consider how they interact with one another! Our Short Term Accommodation and Municipal Accommodation Tax policies must be viewed in the context of our affordable housing shortage. Since STAs have pressured our local housing affordability and supply, the MAT tax should go to supporting the development of affordable housing. This will require an activist Council demanding this change from Queens’ Park which dictates all funds go to tourism. I don’t think the County lacks for tourism?

3. Please outline one County-wide strategic initiative that is missing from the above and should be adopted by Council.

Climate and Environment
There is no strategic initiative that directly addresses the risks and costs we face from climate change and other environmental risks. Peterborough has budgeted $4 million to cope with the affects of Emerald Ash Borer, Kingston $6 million. The County spent $1.7 mil on flooding impacts on municipal property alone in 2017. Heat waves will affect both the crops we are able to grow. French vineyards have seen their entire production wiped out due to high temperatures. Are our wineries not facing the same risks? What are the threats to our agriculture community from environmental sources? Bylaw and policy reviews should pass through a climate impact lens.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 2

Candidates received Invitation 2 on August 31, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 6, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 7, 2022.

Respondents

• None.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 1

Candidates received Invitation 1 on August 24, 2022 and were asked to share their thoughts by August 29, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on August 31, 2022.

Respondents to Invitation 1

• None.

---

Back to top

RSVPs

With the aim of increasing voter turnout in the upcoming municipal election, candidates for Mayor and Ward Councilor in Prince Edward County were invited to share their thoughts on a wide range of issues once a week.

Responses from candidates for Ward 2 – Bloomfield/Hallowell are here:

• Responses to Invitation 8
• Accountability & transparency
• Responses to Invitation 7
• Responses to Invitation 6
• Responses to Invitation 5
• Responses to Invitation 4
• Responses to Invitation 3
• Responses to Invitation 2
• Responses to Invitation 1

Respondents

Note: Candidates’ responses to Invitation 8 are due October 17, 2022. Candidates who wanted their responses to be published before advance voting started were to forward them by October 12, 2022.

	Invitations
Candidates for Ward 2 – Bloomfield/Hallowell (2 offices)	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Sarah MOFFATT
Brad NIEMAN
Phil PRINZEN

Responses to Invitation 8

Candidates received Invitation 8 on October 5, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 17, 2022. Candidates who wanted their responses to be published before advance voting started were to forward them by October 12, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook beginning October 13, 2022. Candidates who responded to Invitation 7 and seem likely to respond to Invitation 8 are denoted with an asterisk below.

Respondents

• Sarah Moffatt
• Phil Prinzen

Sarah Moffatt

1. Please share how you would enhance Council’s approach to public engagement.

As councillor I would aim to be as approachable and accessible as possible. This means that I would be open to contact with the constituents in whatever way they are most comfortable with, whether that be over the phone, email, social media, or in person. I would use a council social media account to get information out over Facebook and Instagram. I would also like to see the use of regularly scheduled town halls so that I could check in with Ward 2 residents and hear directly from them what they feel should be happening at council.

2. Please share why you’re running and why voters should support you in the municipal election.

Hi everyone, my name is Sarah Moffatt and I am running for council in Bloomfield/Hallowell. I grew up in Trenton and now live in Bloomfield with my fiancé Dan. I have a master’s degree in psychology and began my career as a psychotherapist, I now practice social work. My work sees me having to be an expert in a variety of fields such as the legal system, criminal justice, healthcare, mental health care, the school system, and accessibility to other community services. My job allows me to clearly see what is needed in our community and identify where the gaps are. I really care about helping others and I have devoted my career around this.

My work is what motivated me to run. I see firsthand how many people in our community are struggling. The County has a reputation for being an affluent community but there is a large portion of people here who live paycheck to paycheck. I worry that the more vulnerable populations such as seniors and low-income families don’t currently have a voice at the horseshoe and may fall between the cracks.

The other motivating factor for me was the lack of diversity on council. I am not saying that the current council members don’t belong there, everyone brings different strengths. However it’s disheartening as a woman to see only two women on a council of 14. I would like to see our council be a more accurate reflection of our community, and that means having a range of ages, genders, cultures, and backgrounds represented.

My priority issues are affordable housing and healthcare recruitment. House prices in the County are 25% higher than in Belleville and Quinte West and many local residents have been priced out of their own community. Although housing is needed I am worried about the urban sprawl creeping into our agricultural land. A focus on building higher-density rentals in the urban areas would create the 1-2 bedroom units we desperately need, and would lead to a more walkable community with people living closer to amenities.

In terms of healthcare we need to get creative. The municipality should look at incentives such as office space, scholarships, or subsidized housing for healthcare professionals. We could also use more modern services such as tele-health to fill any remaining gaps. We need to see movement in this area immediately. The County has a median age of 56.8, this is 15 years older than the rest of the province.

I have heard repeatedly that residents feel disconnected to their council. I am a hard worker who will promise to make myself available to the constituents and ensure they feel heard. I promise to make decisions that are in the community’s best interest. Most importantly I am offering the residents a choice. As the only non-incumbent who is running in Ward 2 I am offering voters an opportunity for change and a fresh perspective.

---

Phil Prinzen

1. Please share how you would enhance Council’s approach to public engagement.

I would continue to support the have your say platform and would be accessible on my social media platforms (Twitter/instagram) as well as by phone/text and email. Town halls are very good as well although I didn’t do any this last term due to the pandemic. I feel great public engagement happens at events and outings that we attend even if it’s not an official council event.

2. Please share why you’re running and why voters should support you in the municipal election.

I was born and raised in PEC and have called PEC home for my entire life which has allowed me to see and be part of the many changes both good and some maybe not so good. I am married to Selena who was also was born and raised in PEC. We are blessed with 2 beautiful girls who love living here. We are dairy farmers who get to work together every day to run our successful operation on Gilead Road. I am a volunteer firefighter and also a 4-H leader. I feel it is very important to give back to the community you live in.

I have chosen to run for re-election as I believe that I still have a lot to offer for the residents of Ward 2 and PEC as a whole. My first term was a very enjoyable although very different than anyone expected due to the global pandemic. I believe that I bring a common sense approach to meetings and feel like I represent county residents and businesses very well.

The issues facing PEC that are important to me are housing, health care, protection of land and resources and fiscal responsibility. This community needs to be a place that people can afford to live and I have made many decisions with that in mind. Housing is still a major issue and it will take many small steps to tackle the problem. We need to work with all layers of government to fix the crisis. It’s not something we as a municipal council can do on our own. I will continue to support healthcare whether it’s through doctor recruitment programs or support for our new hospital – a community will never survive without healthcare. Land protection and natural resource protection is important to me as we need to work with developers to strategically place new housing developments as our premium land is becoming scarce. I will continue to listen to all the residents and businesses of PEC and hope to represent them for another 4 years around the horseshoe.

---

Back to top

Accountability & transparency

Three Invitations asked candidates to rate six proposals to enhance Council’s accountability and transparency:

• Invitation 4 – Additional conflicts of interest (2 proposals)
• Invitation 5 – Transparency and privacy (3 proposals)
• Invitation 7 – Recorded votes (1 proposal)

We have categorized candidates’ ratings of these proposals [Not in favour | Neither | In favour] below. Candidates were also asked to explain their ratings and we encourage everyone to consider their ratings alongside their explanations.

Table 1. Candidates’ ratings of proposals to enhance Council’s accountability and transparency.

Sarah MOFFATT
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Brad NIEMAN
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Phil PRINZEN
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 7

Candidates received Invitation 7 on October 3, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 11, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on October 12, 2022.

Respondents

• Sarah Moffatt
• Phil Prinzen

Sarah Moffatt

1. For any one of [the nine themes covered in the 2022 VitalSigns Report], please outline a course of action that Council should consider to reinforce successes and/or address challenges identified in the 2022 VitalSigns Report.

Transportation & mobility.
Council introduced the County Transit pilot project in August 2020. This saw the implementation of both fixed bus routes and on-demand service. This was a need in the County and this project is a step in the right direction. My only concern regarding this program is that many in our community don’t know that it exists. As this is a pilot project the data regarding number of riders will be used to justify whether this project continues. I worry that the data may inaccurately show low interest in the program due to lack of education and promotion of the bus service itself. This pilot project was also run during the pandemic and that should be kept in mind when analyzing the data. As the County is a large geographical area and a car-reliant community, I would advocate for the continuation of the County Transit program to ensure that everyone has equal access to transportation and can get to where they need to be in a cost-effective way.

If elected to council I would also like to move forward with increasing the amount of bike lanes throughout the County. This would follow recommendations made in the Cycling Master Plan and the County’s Official Plan. Not only would bike lanes encourage green, active transportation, but would also keep the roads safer for cyclists and motorists alike.

While door knocking in the Heights and the Pineridge Drive neighbourhoods I had several people point out that although they live within walking distance to the Picton core, the lack of sidewalks connecting them leads to a potentially dangerous walk into town. These neighbourhoods feel isolated from the rest of the town and I have heard stories of some people falling and injuring themselves. I would like to see sidewalks added so that we can have a safe, walkable community, and move towards decreasing our reliance on cars.

2. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following proposal: “Council should adopt a Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.”

Neither disagree or agree.

3. Please explain your rating.

I am all for doing whatever is possible to help increase transparency and accountability; however, I worry that if there was a blanket policy that stated all votes needed to be recorded this could create inefficiencies. I believe that the current process of having council members request a recorded vote is working well, particularly during more divisive topics. If voters disagree and feel that more needs to be done then I would be open to looking into this further.

4. Please share examples of how you’ve been trying to learn more about diversity, equity and inclusion. What have been the biggest changes in your thinking? How are you applying what you’ve learned in your work in the County?

Equity, Diversity and Inclusivity (EDI) work is something I am passionate about. I practice social work and am employed with Children’s Aid. As many know, child protection agencies across Canada have a dark past in perpetuating systemic racism. As we move toward Truth and Reconciliation the field of child protection has taken steps to educate all employees regarding the over representation of BIPOC children in care and how we can better support and serve these communities. I am on the EDI committee at my workplace and also completed a full three-day training course devoted to EDI learning.

It was through my EDI work that I became motivated to run for council. When I looked at the picture of the current sitting council I felt that the group lacked diversity and it did not accurately reflect the makeup of the residents living here. I was concerned that minorities, women, and other under-served populations did not have adequate representation and therefore lacked a voice at the horseshoe.

If I am elected to council I would love to see an EDI committee started. The discussions at council regarding the removal of the Sir John A MacDonald statue demonstrated that there is a significant need for this type of learning and conversation to be frequently happening with those making decisions on behalf our residents. A thriving community ensures that all residents are supported. EDI work helps to identify potential barriers that some members of our community may face, and help to eliminate or overcome them so that everyone is provided with the same opportunities. I want Prince Edward County to be a place where all residents feel welcome and proud to call this their home.

---

Phil Prinzen

1. For any one of [the nine themes covered in the 2022 VitalSigns Report], please outline a course of action that Council should consider to reinforce successes and/or address challenges identified in the 2022 VitalSigns Report.

NA
I don’t feel that I have taken the adequate time necessary to study and review the vital signs report to give a fair and honest answer to this question.

2. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following proposal: “Council should adopt a Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.”

Disagree.

3. Please explain your rating.

I feel that not all decisions need a recorded vote. There are many that are unanimous and therefore would just make the meetings prolong. I like the idea that a councillor can call for one if they want it on the record. Since all meetings are recorded I would suggest that the members of council put their hands up higher for better visibly on the streaming and then the public can see how their councillor voted.

4. Please share examples of how you’ve been trying to learn more about diversity, equity and inclusion. What have been the biggest changes in your thinking? How are you applying what you’ve learned in your work in the County?

I am always trying to learn and expand my knowledge about everything including diversity, equity and inclusion. I do this by reading and talking to people. I have always thought of all equally and will continue with that and that we should make policies that don’t exclude anyone.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 6

Candidates received Invitation 6 on September 23, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 3, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on October 5, 2022.

Respondents

• Phil Prinzen

Phil Prinzen

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following service categories:

Service category	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
General government
Protection services
Transportation services
Environmental services
Health services
Social and family services
Social housing
Recreation and cultural services
Planning and development services

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

Planning and development services
I believe that must of the user fees are where they need to be except for planning and development but I also think that there have been some changes in that department and the way they do their business that will lead to improvements in the user fees so it’s not such a bearing on the municipality.

I also think that although we get compared to Norfolk and West Nippising we are still unique in who we are and we have to be careful on comparisons.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 5

Candidates received Invitation 5 on September 20, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 26, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 28, 2022.

Respondents

• Sarah Moffatt
• Brad Nieman
• Phil Prinzen

Sarah Moffatt

1. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following:

“Council should adopt a Strategic Initiative to respond to [the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s] Calls to Action 43, 47 and 57.”

Strongly agree.

2. Please explain your rating.

I firmly believe that it is the responsibility of all levels of government to take active steps towards Truth and Reconciliation. I am particularly interested in Call to Action #57:

“57. We call upon federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal governments to provide education to public servants on the history of Aboriginal peoples, including the history and legacy of residential schools, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Treaties and Aboriginal rights, Indigenous law, and Aboriginal–Crown relations. This will require skills-based training in intercultural competency, conflict resolution, human rights, and anti-racism.”

If I am elected to council I would advocate for an Equity Diversity and Inclusivity committee that would be used to discuss such issues and provide training and education to county council and staff. I believe that an effective EDI committee would meet this Call to Action and could also be beneficial in identifying and addressing the needs of other marginalized populations in our community.

3. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following statements:

“The cost of maintaining a public register of requests for County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Neither disagree or agree.

“The cost of the routine disclosure of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Neither disagree or agree.

“The cost of the active dissemination of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Neither disagree or agree.

4. For any one of your ratings above, please describe your analysis of the different costs and benefits that lead to your conclusion (max. 500 words).

Although I have participated fully in these weekly surveys since they began, I will have to pass on this question. My priority at this time is door knocking to meet the voters and hear what matters most to them. Researching the costs and benefits of the questions you posed would take time away from having conversations with voters and answering other survey requests. However if anyone feels passionate about this topic and would like to discuss it further with me please do not hesitate to call me at 613-813-2361.

---

Brad Nieman

1. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following:

“Council should adopt a Strategic Initiative to respond to [the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s] Calls to Action 43, 47 and 57.”

Agree.

2. Please explain your rating.

The conversation has to get started and the County could be a leader in this.

3. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following statements:

“The cost of maintaining a public register of requests for County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Disagree.

“The cost of the routine disclosure of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Disagree.

“The cost of the active dissemination of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Disagree.

4. For any one of your ratings above, please describe your analysis of the different costs and benefits that lead to your conclusion (max. 500 words).

(a) Everything is computerized, and it wouldn’t take a lot of time to keep updated on the inquiries, dependent on the number of inquiries, then when someone inquires it is readily available.

---

Phil Prinzen

1. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following:

“Council should adopt a Strategic Initiative to respond to [the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s] Calls to Action 43, 47 and 57.”

Agree.

2. Please explain your rating.

Anytime you are able to educate or expand on Truth and Reconciliation it is a benefit.

3. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following statements:

“The cost of maintaining a public register of requests for County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Neither disagree or agree.

“The cost of the routine disclosure of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Neither disagree or agree.

“The cost of the active dissemination of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Neither disagree or agree.

4. For any one of your ratings above, please describe your analysis of the different costs and benefits that lead to your conclusion (max. 500 words).

It is a very hard question to answer when you are not given all the details of costs against requests or benefits. I don’t like to give my opinion when all the information isn’t given.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 4

Candidates received Invitation 4 on September 14, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 19, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 20, 2022.

Respondents

• Sarah Moffatt
• Brad Nieman
• Phil Prinzen

Sarah Moffatt

1. Please identify and describe the general nature of any conflict of pecuniary interest – real or apparent, direct or indirect – that you would foresee needing to declare, given the sort of conflicts that have been disclosed by your predecessors in 2020-2022. [We later clarified the reference to 2020-2022 here. As the preamble re: “Pecuniary Conflicts of Interest” notes, these three years are the ones reported in the County’s online Annual Registries of members’ disclosoure of conflicts of interest.]

None.

2A & 3. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.” Please elaborate.

Agree.

I agree that any time someone uses their position of power/authority for their own personal gain that is a significant concern. Council members should not use the influence of their office for any purpose other than the exercise of their official duties. Not only would this ensure ethics in local politics, but it would also increase the public’s trust in their elected officials. My only hesitation with this would be that Prince Edward County is a small community with a lot of close-knit connections. It would be challenging to define non-pecuniary interests when most councillors are so heavily involved in the community and wear a variety of different hats.

2B & 4. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.” Please elaborate.

Agree.

I believe it is important for the public to trust that their elected officials are making decisions that are best for the community and not guided by what would most benefit their friends and family. However, once again the difficulty lies in the application of any such Code of Conduct. How are we defining a “friend” in a small community where everyone knows everyone? At the very least expanding the Code of Conduct to address other family members would be more practical and would likely have less grey area.

5. In the voter’s own words, please identify the most difficult-to-answer question that you’ve been asked in your campaign.

To be honest I haven’t had that many difficult questions. While door knocking I have been asked questions related to affordable housing, STAs, healthcare, infrastructure, and the environment and these all lead to great discussion. I may have a better answer to this question following the two all candidates meetings scheduled in Bloomfield.

6. Please explain why this question was the most difficult-to-answer.

As above.

7. On October 21, 2020, Council voted unanimously to deny a rezoning application from Picton Terminals to bring in container and cruise ships. If presented with a similar vote today, how would you vote (deny or approve)? Why?

I would uphold council’s 2020 decision. I have heard significant concerns from the residents in the area regarding the environmental impact such traffic could have on Picton Bay and the community’s drinking water.

---

Brad Nieman

1. Please identify and describe the general nature of any conflict of pecuniary interest – real or apparent, direct or indirect – that you would foresee needing to declare, given the sort of conflicts that have been disclosed by your predecessors in 2020-2022. [We later clarified the reference to 2020-2022 here. As the preamble re: “Pecuniary Conflicts of Interest” notes, these three years are the ones reported in the County’s online Annual Registries of members’ disclosoure of conflicts of interest.]

Anything that is covered in the Municipal Act.

2A & 3. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.” Please elaborate.

Neither disagree or agree

[No elaboration]

2B & 4. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.” Please elaborate.

Neither disagree or agree

[No elaboration]

5. In the voter’s own words, please identify the most difficult-to-answer question that you’ve been asked in your campaign.

Questions concerning the pandemic and the way it was handled.

6. Please explain why this question was the most difficult-to-answer.

Because most of the direction came from upper levels of government.

7. On October 21, 2020, Council voted unanimously to deny a rezoning application from Picton Terminals to bring in container and cruise ships. If presented with a similar vote today, how would you vote (deny or approve)? Why?

I would need all of the information made available to me in order to make an informed decision.

---

Phil Prinzen

1. Please identify and describe the general nature of any conflict of pecuniary interest – real or apparent, direct or indirect – that you would foresee needing to declare, given the sort of conflicts that have been disclosed by your predecessors in 2020-2022. [We later clarified the reference to 2020-2022 here. As the preamble re: “Pecuniary Conflicts of Interest” notes, these three years are the ones reported in the County’s online Annual Registries of members’ disclosoure of conflicts of interest.]

I don’t foresee any that I would need to declare on as of right now although it is every council member’s responsibility to declare if they believe they have one.

2A & 3. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.” Please elaborate.

Disagree.

I disagree as I feel there is not a financial personal gain on a non-pecuniary interest.

2B & 4. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.” Please elaborate.

Disagree.

I don’t believe it is a pecuniary conflict of interest if it is not closely related. If you do then maybe you should declare on friends too.

5. In the voter’s own words, please identify the most difficult-to-answer question that you’ve been asked in your campaign.

The questions I get asked at the door I will not be sharing on a public forum. That’s between me and the residents.

6. Please explain why this question was the most difficult-to-answer.

[See above]

7. On October 21, 2020, Council voted unanimously to deny a rezoning application from Picton Terminals to bring in container and cruise ships. If presented with a similar vote today, how would you vote (deny or approve)? Why?

I denied it the first time and would continue to deny it if I received the same information as I did at that meeting.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 3

Candidates received Invitation 3 on September 7, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 12, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 14, 2022.

Respondents

• Sarah Moffatt
• Brad Nieman
• Phil Prinzen

Sarah Moffatt

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following strategic initiatives:

Strategic Initiative	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
By-law and policy review
Downtown revitalization
Healthcare initiatives
Municipal Accommodation Tax
PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
Short-Term Accommodations
Tourism management
Understanding Growth and Water/wastewater infrastructure

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

Tourism Management
I feel dissatisfied with how this has been managed the last two years. There have been reactive bylaws put in place as a result of the high number of tourists that came here in 2020. However, many of these bylaws have hurt our own residents; such as the $400 parking fines throughout the county, and the bylaw regarding people utilizing trailers on their own property. The parking fines in particular go against the County’s own Official Plan that states a goal of increasing access to the waterfront for residents, these fines did the opposite of that.

Healthcare Initiatives
Although I appreciate the fact that The County now has a full-time healthcare recruiter, I am left wondering why this is only happening now. Belleville and Quinte West have had physician recruiters for several years now. The doctor shortage could have been anticipated with the upcoming retirements and proactive planning should have occurred before this turned into the crisis it is now. We are also in the process of building a new hospital but are lacking the healthcare professionals required to staff it. Through my talks with community members I have heard numerous people say there is a need for an after-hours walk-in clinic.

3. Please outline one County-wide strategic initiative that is missing from the above and should be adopted by Council.

Adapting to Climate Change
Not enough has been done to protect our environment. Through my campaigning I have met with residents who feel The County is not doing enough to protect our trees, water, and even spaces that are already deemed Environmentally Protected Land (see the proposal for the Adolphus Reach Resort). The lack of bike lanes and reliable public transportation also results in a community that is reliant on cars.

---

Brad Nieman

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following strategic initiatives:

Strategic Initiative	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
By-law and policy review
Downtown revitalization
Healthcare initiatives
Municipal Accommodation Tax
PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
Short-Term Accommodations
Tourism management
Understanding Growth and Water/wastewater infrastructure

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

Downtown Revitalization
It is not being looked after as far cleanliness and the maintenance of the vegetation.

Housing Corp
It has been 5 years and nothing tangible to show for it. They now have projects ready for construction, which shows we are moving in the right direction.

3. Please outline one County-wide strategic initiative that is missing from the above and should be adopted by Council.

Roads network
Have a continuous 5 year plan for the road construction.

---

Phil Prinzen

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following strategic initiatives:

Strategic Initiative	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
By-law and policy review
Downtown revitalization
Healthcare initiatives
Municipal Accommodation Tax
PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
Short-Term Accommodations
Tourism management
Understanding Growth and Water/wastewater infrastructure

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

I won’t just answer 2 of my ratings. I am comfortable saying I am satisfied with them all as I feel we are moving in the right direction and we need to let things play out for a bit to see the true effect. It has been just over 2.5 years with these and I feel it would be to soon to adjust or make a change. Should be explored every 4-6 [months] is my feeling.

3. Please outline one County-wide strategic initiative that is missing from the above and should be adopted by Council.

Don’t feel anything missing right now.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 2

Candidates received Invitation 2 on August 31, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 6, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 7, 2022.

Respondents

• Sarah Moffatt
• Phil Prinzen

Sarah Moffatt

1. Please identify two internal and one external committee or board listed above whose areas of municipal responsibility would showcase your skills and interests in municipal government.

1. Community & Economic Development Commission
2. Accessibility Advisory Committee
3. Prince Edward County Affordable Housing Corporation

2. For these three committees or boards, please highlight your skills and experience (work, volunteer, life) in those areas of municipal responsibility.
3. For these three committees or boards, please describe the impact you’d hope to make in those areas of municipal responsibility.

Community & Economic Development Commission
I have worked at Highland Shores Children’s Aid for the past 6 years. In this job I work with children and families who rely on the support of social and community services. I am able to directly see what programs are most beneficial to our community members, and I can also identify where the gaps in service are. I am a strong advocate for programs that can help lift people up and support our most vulnerable. Since I work directly with a large part of the population that would be utilizing community services I could act as a liaison to collect feedback regarding what is working and what is not. I would ensure that community programs are tailored to the needs of our residents and those who would benefit most from these services. I worry that low-income earners and families are forgotten about around the horseshoe, I would ensure that they have a voice and that their needs are taken into consideration. Although I may not have a background in business I have a vested interest in seeing our community thrive. Local businesses are a crucial part of our economy, job market, and community identity. Small business owners are also our friends and neighbours, I want them to feel confident that they have someone standing up for them and their interests.

Accessibility Advisory Committee
Working through an Equity, Diversity, and Inclusivity lens is a passion of mine. I have been an active member of the EDI committee at my workplace for 2 years. The purpose of this committee is to ensure that everyone is provided with the same opportunities and that any barriers are identified and removed. This role sees me educating and providing awareness of EDI-related topics to all the staff at my workplace. I have also been a board member for Adam’s Hope, a local charity focused on supporting families with children with autism. Through this work I saw the numerous challenges that children with health conditions or impairments had to face. I would like to carry on this work by being an advocate for all of those in our community and visitors to the County by making sure they get an equal opportunity to experience all that this area has to offer. A crucial part of this committee is getting the voice of the people this would impact the most and ensuring they are included in the process.

Prince Edward County Affordable Housing Corporation
I have been working in the social service field for 9 years. Every day I see the direct impact of the housing crisis – I have witnessed families living in tents, trailers, or in their friend’s living room. I know how hard it is to afford suitable housing on a fixed income such as OW, ODSP, or CPP. The CMHC defines affordable housing as rent/mortgage that costs less than 30% of a household’s income. When I help my clients look for rentals I can clearly see that there is nothing available that would meet this definition of affordable on their income. I see families being priced out of their own homes with nowhere to go. Waitlists for social housing can be 6+ years. Through my workplace I have worked collaboratively with housing services such as Lennox and Addington Social Housing, the Community Advocacy and Legal Centre, and Habitat for Humanity. I am well aware of the services that are currently available and the areas that need improvement. I am working the frontline with a large portion of the population that would be utilizing this service. I have an active pulse on what is needed and will be a strong advocate for those in need of affordable housing.

4. How would you account for these rates of voter turnout in the County in recent municipal elections?

Low voter turnout is not an issue that is unique to the County. According to the Association of Municipalities Ontario the average voter turnout across the province for the 2018 municipal election was 38% and this has been a downward trend for the past several elections. What I hear from people both locally and provincially is they feel it is difficult to find information about the candidates and their platforms. There are limited media sources that compile profiles and information regarding each candidate where an elector can easily access it and compare. When voters feel uninformed it is easy for them to become uninterested in the election as a whole. There is also a theory that the low voter turnout could be the result of voter fatigue – once again in 2022 we see a municipal election closely follow a provincial one (and it was only last year that we also had a federal election). It is unfortunate that voter turnout is the lowest for municipal elections because this is also where people’s votes hold the most power.

5. Please relate an occasion when you (nearly) decided not to vote in an election.

I found myself disinterested in local politics as a youth. This was due to the feeling that politics wasn’t for me or my demographic. I didn’t see myself reflected in the range of candidates – partly due to age but also gender. At the time the candidates didn’t seem interested in making the effort to reach out to and engage with younger voters. This may account for why voters age 18-29 have notoriously low voter turnout for municipal elections. Even still, female candidates are the vast minority. The Association of Municipalities Ontario states that only 27% of candidates in the 2018 election were female. It is difficult to feel engaged in politics when you look at your potential representatives and can’t imagine how they would represent you or your needs.

6. How would you propose to work with other candidates to increase voter turnout in the County in the upcoming municipal election?

1. The first step in creating a solution to any problem is identifying why the problem exists in the first place. For example if there are barriers such as lack of transportation that are preventing people from getting to the polls then coming up with a solution such as free bus service on election day would help to eliminate this barrier. If work schedules have been a barrier to some the County offers advanced and now online voting methods for this year’s election.
2. Candidates need to be doing all they can to engage with a variety of different demographics in different ways. Try to engage them in their preferred way such as face to face, email, social media, phone, etc. Target youth and get them interested in politics early by doing information sessions at schools or youth programs such as the ROC, or utilizing programs such as the Hour for Hour challenge the purpose of which is to get high school students involved in civic activities for volunteer hours.
3. I have heard people say that they don’t understand the format of council meetings or the language used and they feel this is a barrier to being involved in council meetings. This can lead to apathy in the municipal process. Electors may also feel that if they don’t understand council and the role then they may not feel qualified to promote someone to this position. Helping educate the public regarding municipal roles and proceedings can help them feel more comfortable with reaching out to their member of council or participating in meetings.
4. Forums such as this weekly questionnaire that Paul Allen is putting together can help to compile responses in one easy-to-access location. Voters then have the opportunity to clearly see the candidates’ responses and compare them. This addresses the concern identified in question 4 regarding voters feeling they don’t have enough information to make an informed decision.

---

Phil Prinzen

1. Please identify two internal and one external committee or board listed above whose areas of municipal responsibility would showcase your skills and interests in municipal government.

1. Agricultural Advisory Committee
2. Planning Committee
3. Hastings/Quinte Emergency Services Committee

Agriculture and planning would be the internal committees and Hastings/Quinte Emergency Service Committee would be the external committee that would most likely showcase my skills although there are a number of others that interest me.

2. For these three committees or boards, please highlight your skills and experience (work, volunteer, life) in those areas of municipal responsibility.

I was on the agriculture committee as well as planning this last term. I work, volunteer and live in agriculture everyday and understand the risks, threats and importance of it for our community. For planning after being on the committee and recognizing the importance of good solid planning I think it works hand in hand with agriculture. Emergency service is important and I believe that being on the fire department I understand the importance of the emergency services.

3. For these three committees or boards, please describe the impact you’d hope to make in those areas of municipal responsibility.

I hope to be a sensible voice and provide sound opinions to share with all of council before decisions are made.

4. How would you account for these rates of voter turnout in the County in recent municipal elections?

I think there is a disconnect between residents and municipal politics. Whether they believe they aren’t being heard or cant make an impact they just decide not to vote.

5. Please relate an occasion when you (nearly) decided not to vote in an election.

I have always voted. I have never nearly decided not to vote.

6. How would you propose to work with other candidates to increase voter turnout in the County in the upcoming municipal election?

I encourage every person I talk to on my campaign trail to get out and vote. I would hope the other candidates are doing the same.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 1

With the aim of increasing voter turnout in the upcoming municipal election, candidates for Mayor and Ward Councilor in Prince Edward County are being invited to share their thoughts on a wide range of issues once a week.

Candidates received Invitation 1 on August 24, 2022 and were asked to share their thoughts by August 29, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on August 31, 2022.

Respondents

• Sarah Moffatt
• Brad Nieman
• Phil Prinzen

Sarah Moffatt

1. How long have you resided in the County?

I am from Trenton and have lived in this area for over 30 years. The county has been my second home for the last few years but I made it official in 2021.

1b. (Additional question for candidates for Ward Councilor only): How long have you resided in the Ward in which you are running to be Councilor?

I moved to Bloomfield last year and already feel a deep connection to the community.

2. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the current term of Council (Fall 2018 – present).

NA.

3. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the previous term of Council (Fall 2014 – Fall 2018).

NA.

4. Please identify your membership or volunteering in a not-for-profit, non-governmental organization associated with the County during the current term of Council (November 2018 – present).

Community service has been a commitment ingrained in me since I was a teenager. It is unclear to me why the question of volunteer work is centered around the current term of council as volunteer work doesn’t follow terms, it is typically something that is ongoing. Throughout the past several years I have been on the board of directors for the G. May Project, a local charity focused on supporting child victims of sexual abuse; and I was on the board of directors for Adam’s Hope, a local charity raising money to help families who have children with autism. I have also worked for and remained involved with The Children’s Foundation. The Children’s Foundation offers a wide range of programs and services to local children and families in the area such as sending children to camp, providing cribs to new mothers, and ensuring every child has gifts and a proper meal at Christmas through the Angel Tree program.

5. How do you understand talk of tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County?

There is a growing “us versus them” mentality in the county and I worry that questions such as these only further the divide. How do you define “old” and “new”? Take my circumstance for example, I have lived in this area for 30 years but only just recently moved to Bloomfield – Would I be classified as old or new? Trying to label people only leads to assumptions at best and xenophobia at worst.

Please indicate your agreement with the following statements:

6a. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s agenda. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

As I cannot get inside of a sitting councillor’s head I cannot say for sure what influences their decisions, to provide an answer would be making an assumption on my part that would not be fair. This question also generalizes council as a whole. Although there may be some councillors who are influenced by “new” or “old” residents, there may be an equal number of sitting councillors who are not. We need to recognize that each member of council is an individual that is motivated by their own personal values and beliefs.

6b. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s decisions. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

See above.

7. Please identify any role you see yourself in addressing any tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County.

As noted above I could be seen as both “old” or “new” depending on who you ask. My hope is that this dual perspective could help me bridge the gap and help people recognize that whether old or new residents we likely all have common goals for what we want to see happen to our community. Ideally I would like to see us forgo this divisive type of language altogether and recognize that we are all county residents. As councillor I would represent all of my constituents equally, whether they have lived here for generations or just moved in yesterday. A divided community is not one that can flourish.

---

Brad Nieman

1. How long have you resided in the County?

45 years.

1b. (Additional question for candidates for Ward Councilor only): How long have you resided in the Ward in which you are running to be Councilor?

32 years.

2. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the current term of Council (Fall 2018 – present).

Councilor Bloomfield/Hallowell. Agriculture, Traffic, Hiring, Prince Edward Lennox Addington Social Services, Waste Services, and Bloomfield/Hallowell Recreation Committees.

3. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the previous term of Council (Fall 2014 – Fall 2018).

Councilor Bloomfield/Hallowell. Agriculture, Waste Services, Audit, and Bloomfield/Hallowell Recreation Committees.

4. Please identify your membership or volunteering in a not-for-profit, non-governmental oganization associated with the County during the current term of Council (November 2018 – present).

None.

5. How do you understand talk of tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County?

No comment.

Please indicate your agreement with the following statements:

6a. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s agenda. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

6b. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s decisions. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

7. Please identify any role you see yourself in addressing any tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County.

No comment.

---

Phil Prinzen

1. How long have you resided in the County?

43 years (entire life).

1b. (Additional question for candidates for Ward Councilor only): How long have you resided in the Ward in which you are running to be Councilor?

43 years.

2. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the current term of Council (Fall 2018 – present).

Councillor. Audit, Planning, and Agriculture Committees.

3. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the previous term of Council (Fall 2014 – Fall 2018).

[No response]

4. Please identify your membership or volunteering in a not-for-profit, non-governmental oganization associated with the County during the current term of Council (November 2018 – present).

4-H Ontario as a leader. Also volunteer firefighter with Station 6 (not sure if that is non-governmental). Meals on Wheels.

5. How do you understand talk of tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County?

I understand it and would like to think it has lessened in the last few years. But also feel that it went both ways. Old didn’t like the new and the new didn’t like the old and their ways.

Please indicate your agreement with the following statements:

6a. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s agenda. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

6b. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s decisions. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

7. Please identify any role you see yourself in addressing any tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County.

I believe the role we have is to make the best decisions for the residents of the county as a whole and not think of people as new and old. Which I like to believe is what I do.

---

Back to top

RSVPs

With the aim of increasing voter turnout in the upcoming municipal election, candidates for Mayor and Ward Councilor in Prince Edward County were invited to share their thoughts on a wide range of issues once a week.

Responses from candidates for Ward 3 – Wellington are here:

• Responses to Invitation 8
• Accountability & transparency
• Responses to Invitation 7
• Responses to Invitation 6
• Responses to Invitation 5
• Responses to Invitation 4
• Responses to Invitation 3
• Responses to Invitation 2
• Responses to Invitation 1

Respondents

	Invitations
Candidates for Ward 3 – Wellington (1 office)	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Jennifer COBB
Corey ENGELSDORFER
Heather NORLOCK

Responses to Invitation 8

Candidates received Invitation 8 on October 5, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 17, 2022. Candidates who wanted their responses to be published before advance voting started were to forward them by October 12, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook beginning October 13, 2022.

Respondents

• Jennifer Cobb
• Corey Engelsdorfer
• Heather Norlock

Jennifer Cobb

1. Please share how you would enhance Council’s approach to public engagement.

Wellington has a voter turn-out of over 60 percent. It is higher than County average, and higher than Provincial average, for voter turn-out.

I believe that these statistics indicate the high level of engagement in the Wellington/Ward 3 area. I attribute this to the higher than provincial median age in Wellington. Voters here are people who have lived long, productive lives, and understand the necessity of civic engagement.

Recognized as one of the “Most Patriotic Communities” in Canada a few years ago, Wellington also has a wide range of active service clubs, high volume of volunteers and engaged events widely attended by the community.

Voter engagement can be enhanced in Wellington/Ward 3 through in-person meetings. As a candidate for the office of Councillor for Ward 3, I have chosen to go door-to-door. Our demographic is somewhat older overall than the social media demographic. I believe that many people still prefer to meet “in real life”. Organizing regular coffee gatherings with residents to hear what is working, what isn’t working, what needs attention and what is prospering would enable the Councillor to stay connected to community issues, themes, successes and gains, NOT just problems.

If Council became more community centred approach, and invited participation more widely, I think they would have many people who like to participate, not just in complaining, or identifying problems, but recognizing good work in our community, stellar volunteerism, community driven successes and other good news stories.

Council could adopt a community centred approach which removes barriers to participation – not hold meetings during the day when workers cannot attend, not engage in marathon meetings which are not suitable for anyone living with a disability, and promote attendance by offering food, and transportation supports.

Council could also engage in real community based research, NOT just “Have your say” which is limited to computer literate people who have internet access and own computers. Such community based approaches would be held in the communities, would acknowledge people as “experts” in their home communities, and be present in a “listen and learn” capacity, not a “we know how to do it, and this is how it will be done”.

2. Please share why you’re running and why voters should support you in the municipal election.

I am skilled, accessible and committed to my community. I bring extensive governance training and proven practice to the table. I have a long background in governance within a multi-stakeholder, unionized environment. I have training in Public Sector Accounting Practices, and extensive experience in both the internal and external audit process. These skills will contribute to a climate of transparency, clarity and consistency at Council.

I live, work, play and shop in Wellington and I am running against two people who do not live in the village. How could they really represent Wellingtonians? I know many people from many sectors of the Wellington community, and will build upon many established relationships.

I am a part-time employee and self-employed person who has an economy of time which will afford me committed participation at Council. I have the time and energy to fulfill my desire to serve my community.

I am running for Council to try to bring a stronger practice of representation to Wellington. I have strong research skills, and am constantly learning. These skills are needed to help residents understand the municipal issues they are facing, and to help resident be heard in the Council decision making process.

I understand the need to know who does what, and what level of decision making each person/role enjoys. Comprehending the scope of the position of Councillor, what the decision making capacity and authority are, and creating communication loops within the community I represent will enable me to advocate for “Wellington based” solutions to Wellington problems.

I also seek to bring some diversity to Council, and as a female, sole head of household, living with a disability I have the experience to challenge able-ism, economic exclusion and sexism if/when it arises at Council.

Many of you know me and know that whatever I do, I do it well. Whether in my Library job, my Pilates, Yoga or Functional Fitness classes, as a wedding officiant or as a widely published author, I am diligent, precise, prepared, knowledgeable, and treat people with respect. I am a helper, and a doer.

---

Corey Engelsdorfer

1. Please share how you would enhance Council’s approach to public engagement.

I believe it all hinges on making residents feel like their voices and opinions are heard. Often, public consultation is just a check box that needs to be ticked off. We need to engage more on a group and one to one level. I would suggest events throughout the year to do so. Events where all of council can attend and be open and transparent.

2. Please share why you’re running and why voters should support you in the municipal election.

Wellington is at a crossroads. The village is at the cusp of unprecedented growth. In the near future we may see over 1,000 new homes. In anticipation, we are building an expensive new water tower and waterworks facility. As a long-time resident and business owner who is raising a young family, I have a vested interest in ensuring not only Wellington, but the County as a whole remains a sustainable, healthy and livable community. I will be the one to advocate for Wellington at Shire Hall.

Over the past 12 years working at The Times, I have followed our municipal government closely. I read the reports. I write the stories. I watch the meetings and I am well-versed on current and past issues. I am Wellington’s choice for sensible and level headed decision making.

I am passionate about Wellington. I grew up in the village and my day to day life still circles around Wellington. I am an active member and past chair of the Wellington Recreation Committee and also play a large part in Pumpkinfest. I am a member of the Wellington Beach Taskforce Team where we are currently working to address and resolve a multitude of short term and long term issues, and the impact of the Wellington waterfront on the community and local businesses.

One key issue that relate to Wellington includes urban sprawl and development north of the village. Growth is coming. I will work to ensure the pace of this growth is managed and the design of the communities fit with the existing village. I will also advocate that the Secondary Plan be enforced and that Belleville Road not turn into a maze of stripmalls, pulling commercial out of downtown.

Water rates are becoming more unaffordable for residents. Your bills are already among the highest in Ontario. Now Shire Hall is planning to spend $100 million to expand Wellington’s waterworks. It’s time for fair and honest representation at Shire Hall for waterworks ratepayers. I will advocate for a waterworks commission that will look at water and sewer rates separately from council in a more transparent setting.

Tourism in the County is down this season. It now appears that some of the reactionary measures that were put in place after two busy COVID summers were overreaching. Visitors have been driven away through “us and them” fines. Locals are receiving fines due to a program that wasn’t thought through. The tourism sector has had its share of growing pains. It is time to strike a fair balance between visitors and locals.

The local history, heritage and culture of the County should be preserved for future generations to enjoy. This can be done by working closely with the Heritage Advisory Committee.

Working closely with organizations such as Quinte Conservation, the County should continually review and update policies and bylaws and enforce keeping our community safe and beautiful.

We should also work towards creating natural and sustainable open spaces and habitats within the any new subdivision. Whether for recreation or habitat, these spaces contribute to the structure of our community and must be preserved and protected. Active links for pedestrians and cyclists from any new developments should also be mandatory, as well as a tree replacement plan.

In the Official Plan, having natural core areas non-developable was a good start. I would have liked to see natural core linkages also protected at the same standard.

Wellington’s Secondary Plan highlights the village forest. It contributes greatly to quality of life in Wellington and helps portray the community as a healthy, green, and attractive place for both residents and visitors. The village forest is a vital part of the natural environment as it improves air and water quality, provides shade and reduces energy consumption.

A little about me

I was born and raised in Wellington. I attended Pinecrest Elementary School in Bloomfield, and from there attended PECI in Picton. In 2004 I left the County to attend Durham College in Oshawa. I enrolled in their Graphic Design program. In 2007, I graduated and secured a placement at Formula Media Group, a division of Torstar. There, I worked on publications such as Carguide, World of Wheels, Boatguide, Canadian AutoWorld, West of the City and the Hamilton Spectator Wheels section. In 2010 I moved back to the County and accepted a position at The Times. In May of 2017 I purchased The Times from Rick Conroy and continue to publish it weekly each Wednesday. I have 3 kids – Amelia (8), Emmett (6) and Malcolm (11 months). I am engaged to Katie, and we are getting married next summer in the County.

---

Heather Norlock

1. Please share how you would enhance Council’s approach to public engagement.

Promoting the Have Your Say Platform on social media more, questionnaires concerning issues within PEC, more town hall discussions involving community members, building a relationship with all members of the community, perhaps “Have Your Say” drop boxes at the local libraries. Being visible in the community to speak with all residents.

2. Please share why you’re running and why voters should support you in the municipal election.

I grew up in Wellington, living in 6 houses in Ashgill Gardens, and one on Niles St. before moving to my forever home on County Road 2. Completing Jr. Kindergarten to Grade 8 at CML Snider, and completing my 4 years of high school at PECI. Prince Edward County has been my life-long home. I plan to stay in Prince Edward County for the rest of my life. I hope to one day raise a family here, and have my future children attend CML Snider.

I want to help make positive changes for today, and for the future of Prince Edward County. I am smart, I work hard, I am dedicated, and I will pour my heart into this. I’m hungry to learn more and I’m not afraid to do the extra work.

I am in my final year of schooling, studying Civil Engineering, this knowledge and experience will help me to make informed decisions and educated input regarding water, wastewater, development, roads and planning. As a young female, with progressive views I feel my voice would benefit council. I am an advocate and supporter of equity and diversity and will continue to learn and grow with our community.

I have deep appreciation and love for all of Prince Edward County, but my roots are in Wellington. As a young professional I want to encourage, support and advocate for young professionals and young families moving to Wellington. Promote more open discussions regarding affordable living and first-time home buying. I want to advocate for the youth being able to afford to live in their hometown and raise their families here, as I believe the County needs this for the future.

I want to promote the growth of small businesses in our community and to encourage entrepreneurs to open/continue with small businesses in PEC.

I want to focus on encouraging doctors to come to Prince Edward County, and advocate for a walk-in clinic.

I want to address property tax issues, high water bills, affordable housing, streamlining municipal processes, managing tourism, and transparency.

I am looking to maintain the small-town feel of Wellington and encourage responsible development for everyone.

Over my 27 years living in Prince Edward County, I have seen rapid growth and change, I would like to be an active partner in the community to manage any further growth and change.

I, Heather Norlock, am asking for your support. I want to advocate for our community. I have no hidden agenda, I am an advocate for complete transparency. I am an open book. I am a woman who loves her hometown and wants to be there for her community.

There is a critical absence of youth voice in Prince Edward County. Don’t be part of the disconnect. Invest in young voices.

---

Back to top

Accountability & transparency

Three Invitations asked candidates to rate six proposals to enhance Council’s accountability and transparency:

• Invitation 4 – Additional conflicts of interest (2 proposals)
• Invitation 5 – Transparency and privacy (3 proposals)
• Invitation 7 – Recorded votes (1 proposal)

We have categorized candidates’ ratings of these proposals [Not in favour | Neither | In favour] below. Candidates were asked to explain their ratings and we encourage everyone to consider them too.

Table 1. Candidates’ ratings of proposals to enhance Council’s accountability and transparency.

Jennifer COBB
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Corey ENGELSDORFER
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Heather NORLOCK
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 7

Candidates received Invitation 7 on October 3, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 11, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on October 12, 2022.

Respondents

• Jennifer Cobb
• Corey Engelsdorfer
• Heather Norlock

Jennifer Cobb

1. For any one of [the nine themes covered in the 2022 VitalSigns Report], please outline a course of action that Council should consider to reinforce successes and/or address challenges identified in the 2022 VitalSigns Report.

Environment.
The Corporation of the County of Prince Edward brought forward a motion declaring a Climate Emergency in 2019. The motion was quite general, and lacked finite information, action or steps. We need to move beyond the “name and frame” phase, and set a finite plan of action.

I would like to see the Environmental Advisory Committee widen its membership, undertake an environmental assets and challenges inventory, and bring forward a plan of action to protect, preserve, conserve, restore and promote environmental health. Such a plan would need to include SMART goals: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-based.

Through partnership with Hastings and Prince Edward Public Health, the County Council could begin to make “health” a priority in all of our policies. This would require, and enact, a holistic policy perspective that acknowledges the interrelated nature of many of our “issues”, including climate change.

With a more holistic perspective, we could begin to envision what a healthy community looks like, and set goals, steps and measurements toward becoming a “healthy community”.

A healthy community is one in which the health of individuals, communities, infrastructure and systems, the environment and climate are all seen as important, and valuable.

Greater collaboration, and input, could be invited from local organizations and initiatives including: the Prince Edward Stewardship Council, PEC Field Naturalists, Tree the County, the Environmental Sustainability group, THRIVE.PEC, and Healthy Communities.

2. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following proposal: “Council should adopt a Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.”

Disagree.

3. Please explain your rating.

My experience at Hasting and Prince Edward District School Board has helped me understand that time and energy is best invested in comprehensive Governance training for Council members. When individuals understand Governance, and the complexity of their role, and when the Mayor understands the position as one of “facilitating discussion and good decision making”, then the Mayor and Council should be operating for the good of the “county” and community.

When individuals call for a “recorded vote” it is often done in a way that is angry, shaming, and comes from a “I am right and you are wrong … and I want everyone to know that” perspective. This better than/worse than divisive perspective doesn’t fit with a collaborative, cohesive governance model. Let’s spend our time, energy and money on building governance skills, facilitating lively discussion, and all Council members operating from a “what’s best for the County (not just me individually)” perspective.

4. Please share examples of how you’ve been trying to learn more about diversity, equity and inclusion. What have been the biggest changes in your thinking? How are you applying what you’ve learned in your work in the County?

How I’ve been trying to learn more about diversity, equity and inclusion
Taking courses to educate myself on Anti-Indigenous Racism, Anti-Black Racism, Supporting Gender Identity and Gender Choice, Plain Language/Inclusive Language, Understanding the origins of Bias, Letting go of power over structures.

What have been the biggest changes in your thinking?
I have slowly moved from thinking I know what is right, to recognizing that I have formed those opinions from a limited perspective which doesn’t include all perspectives. I have come to understand that “power over” dynamics prohibit full inclusion, and have tried to examine my thoughts, words, actions and ways of being to recognize where I operate from assumptions, from a basis of power-over others, or from an assumption of power or superiority. The biggest challenge is always in recognizing the behaviour, and then inviting conversations which help to reframe the limited assumptions I may have been operating from.

How are you applying what you’ve learned in your work in the County?
I continue to do my personal work to untangle the web of lies I have been raised in. I also try to examine my personal bias and learn new and more inclusive ways of thinking, acting and speaking. My personal work is my responsibility. I need to root out power-over assumptions in my thinking. And be accountable and responsible for my behaviour. I also choose to be open and responsive to hearing from others who experience me as operating from a “power-over” perspective, and let go of being defensive, in order to move more into “empowered” and solution-based inclusion.

---

Corey Engelsdorfer

1. For any one of [the nine themes covered in the 2022 VitalSigns Report], please outline a course of action that Council should consider to reinforce successes and/or address challenges identified in the 2022 VitalSigns Report.

Sustainable community.
I believe it is truly important for The County to be a healthy and sustainable community. If we can work towards this, it will help alleviate many of the other issues that the Vital Signs report mentions. We need to facilitate meaningful engagement with our residents and community on planning and land use decisions. Have Your Say is a useful tool, but too many decisions are being made based on little response. We also need to provide more housing choices. I would like to see a mix of housing in all future subdivisions. The plan for Fields of Wellington is a great one, where there are townhomes, detached homes and homes with apartments over the garage. These homes should also have focus on green initiatives. This will also attract young families who bring jobs with them. People move here for the sense of place and often start new tourism-related businesses. With more residents comes the role of more transportation options. It is important that any new development provide pedestrian and cycling links to town. This also helps promote a clean and safe environment for all.

2. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following proposal: “Council should adopt a Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.”

Disagree.

3. Please explain your rating.

A recorded vote can be called for by a member of council. I believe this is enough protection. If a recorded vote is called for every motion, meetings will be long and drawn out, causing for lack of attention given to certain issues.

4. Please share examples of how you’ve been trying to learn more about diversity, equity and inclusion. What have been the biggest changes in your thinking? How are you applying what you’ve learned in your work in the County?

To me, DEI means welcoming and accepting the participation and thoughts of different groups of individuals. It also means equal access to opportunities and resources to all. As a cis white male I am aware that opportunities are afforded to me in a way they might not be to others. I believe it begins entirely with self awareness and also taking the time to listen and learn.I also think understanding my privilege and bias is essential. This way I can make changes in my thinking and behavior. I was also held to account two years ago when as Publisher of The Times, I mistakenly allowed an anti-trans ad to run. We live in a community that is welcoming to all, and I took the time to listen and learn. I attended the rally against The Times and was able to allow The Times to be a platform for giving those groups a voice when they often do not get one.

I continue to learn each day.

---

Heather Norlock

1. For any one of [the nine themes covered in the 2022 VitalSigns Report], please outline a course of action that Council should consider to reinforce successes and/or address challenges identified in the 2022 VitalSigns Report.

Sustainable community.
The report reads that the decline in the youth age group has flattened for the first time in 10 years, while the workforce age population continues to decrease. We need to keep our youth in Prince Edward County and encourage more youth to come to Prince Edward County. To do this we must address the housing crisis, cost of living in PEC, lack of child care and living wages.

2. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following proposal: “Council should adopt a Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.”

Strongly agree.

3. Please explain your rating.

I believe all votes should be recordered. This provides an open and transparent council.

4. Please share examples of how you’ve been trying to learn more about diversity, equity and inclusion. What have been the biggest changes in your thinking? How are you applying what you’ve learned in your work in the County?

As a young female with progressive views, I continue to educate myself through local organizations that uplift 2SLGBTQ+ and BIPOC voices. I advocate for diversity, equity and inclusion in my everyday life, as well as take proactive measures to creating safe spaces for everyone. In my life I have also unlearned aspects to create a better space for diverse thinking.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 6

Candidates received Invitation 6 on September 23, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 3, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on October 5, 2022.

Respondents

• • Jennifer Cobb
  • Corey Engelsdorfer
  • Heather Norlock

Jennifer Cobb

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following service categories:

Service category	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
General government
Protection services
Transportation services
Environmental services
Health services
Social and family services
Social housing
Recreation and cultural services
Planning and development services

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

Planning and development services
Prince Edward County is in the midst of a land grab and development frenzy, and yet list a very low revenue coming from Planning and Development, while indicating a significant level of expense.

I am Very Dissatisfied that the practice of selling the County has been so short sighted. I would like to see much larger revenues coming from Planning and Development, representing the Corporation of the County of Prince Edward charging developers much higher fees for the development of subdivisions and large scale developments. When they grant development applications for large scale projects, they need to include in the planning and development fees, the cost of needed infrastructure development (water, sewers, roads, doctors etc) to accommodate the added population that the development will bring.

By attaching a high price tag to the ‘privilege’ of large scale development, the municipality could slow the mad frenzy, and create a larger income stream which could more realistically support needed infrastructure development.

Environmental services
I find it fascinating that the majority of the cost for Environmental services is covered by the revenue. This means that the households who are on water and sanitary sewer hook up are the ones who pay for the majority of environmental services in Prince Edward County, despite the fact that water/sewer treatment facilities are County infrastructure and assets.

Our Council, the majority of whom live on properties which utilize a well and septic tank system, have made the decision to saddle ‘users’ with the costs of water and sewer treatment. Compared to other line items in the spread sheet, Environmental Service has the lowest Revenue to Expense ratio.

I am also disturbed to see that expenses have stayed about the same over the three years, but revenues have gone up. This against a backdrop of many residents not being able to afford water/sewer, and the need for the County Community Foundation to assist so many people with their Municipal Financial Relief Grant.

---

Corey Engelsdorfer

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following service categories:

Service category	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
General government
Protection services
Transportation services
Environmental services
Health services
Social and family services
Social housing
Recreation and cultural services
Planning and development services

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

Protection services
This is a big bill for the County and taxpayers to pay. In the summer months, our officer count and cost goes up because of the Provincial Park. Ideally, I would like to see the Provincial Park fund a portion of the cost of Protection Services.

Environmental services
Again, a very large cost for waste and recycling disposal. It might be time to look at a localized collection service instead of a door to door approach. With such a rural landscape, the cost is excessive to provide a door to door service, especially for recycling.

---

Heather Norlock

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following service categories:

Service category	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
General government
Protection services
Transportation services
Environmental services
Health services
Social and family services
Social housing
Recreation and cultural services
Planning and development services

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

Health services
I am very disappointed in health service that are provided for county residents, with the number of family doctors retiring and it feels like no encouragement or effort has been put into finding more family doctors, or the encouragement of developing a walk-in clinic for all of Prince Edward County residents with no family doctor. All approvals for new developments when we current residents cannot find doctors.

Planning and development services
There is a disconnect in county departments, and feel it is almost impossible to get anything done in a timely fashion whether it be severing or building a new home. The process is incredibly expensive, long, drawn out. There is no consistency. Changing zoning of people’s property with no notice. Personally, I feel the current council have only benefit themselves and not the public.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 5

Candidates received Invitation 5 on September 20, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 26, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 28, 2022.

Respondents

• Jennifer Cobb
• Corey Engelsdorfer

Jennifer Cobb

1. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following:

“Council should adopt a Strategic Initiative to respond to [the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s] Calls to Action 43, 47 and 57.”

Agree.

2. Please explain your rating.

We need to have a consistent and comprehensive set of Human Rights that apply to all Canadians. The Calls to Action should be implemented by all levels of government, PLUS Anti-Indigenous Racism training should be a requirement of all people who hold public office. We need to collectively, publicly and consciously begin to change the intrenched racism within Canadian Society.

3. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following statements:

“The cost of maintaining a public register of requests for County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Strongly disagree.

“The cost of the routine disclosure of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Strongly disagree.

“The cost of the active dissemination of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Strongly disagree.

4. For any one of your ratings above, please describe your analysis of the different costs and benefits that lead to your conclusion (max. 500 words).

I am shocked that the County doesn’t have a registry, nor an Ombudsperson to resolve complaints. All public governance bodies that I know of, have a registry.

As public officials, the work of the County should be a matter of public record. We have a long history of ‘old boys’ networks’ making back-room deals. This is not democracy, and under Public Sector Accounting Practices, is illegal.

We need to be fully accountable for public funds. That means having a registry should be a requirement – it proves accountability, and demonstrates that there is nothing to hide.

When we can learn from our mistakes, we can improve. When we make our records open, transparent and accessible to all citizens, we are able to better identify those who are not following PSAP Procurement Guidelines, or are in violation of other municipal, provincial or federal laws. This further enables the County to weed out any violation of the laws which equally apply to us all.

---

Corey Engelsdorfer

1. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following:

“Council should adopt a Strategic Initiative to respond to [the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s] Calls to Action 43, 47 and 57.”

Agree.

2. Please explain your rating.

The National Day for Truth and Reconciliation should be a moment for everyone including leaders in every government to reflect upon and recognize the trauma of the Residential School system. There must be a change in the way systems continue to operate and negatively impact Indigenous Peoples, and ultimately one that doesn’t fail to create equal opportunities for all.

3. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following statements:

“The cost of maintaining a public register of requests for County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Disagree.

“The cost of the routine disclosure of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Disagree.

“The cost of the active dissemination of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Disagree.

4. For any one of your ratings above, please describe your analysis of the different costs and benefits that lead to your conclusion (max. 500 words).

As the publisher of a local newspaper, I believe all documents should be easily accessible for the general public. County ratepayers have a right to know how their money is spent. I view ratepayers as shareholders in the corporation.

Openness and Transparency equals Accountability. The essential purpose of access to information is to support the democratic process: When municipal government proactively provides routine access to government held information, it creates accountability.

As far as cost benefit analysis, I am not sure I am qualified to comment. A by law would need to be made for fees and charges.

---

Heather Norlock

1. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following:

“Council should adopt a Strategic Initiative to respond to [the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s] Calls to Action 43, 47 and 57.”

Strongly agree.

2. Please explain your rating.

It is very important we continue to do better and better. We must educate, continue to learn, and do our part. It is very important, and it is what every municipality should be doing.

3. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following statements:

“The cost of maintaining a public register of requests for County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Strongly disagree.

“The cost of the routine disclosure of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Strongly disagree.

“The cost of the active dissemination of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Strongly disagree.

4. For any one of your ratings above, please describe your analysis of the different costs and benefits that lead to your conclusion (max. 500 words).

It is important to be transparent while still protecting privacy. I would need more information of estimates for the costs of active dissemination of County records in order to speak on this properly, but I do believe this is important and would appreciated by the community. We need to be transparent and honest with the community.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 4

Candidates received Invitation 4 on September 14, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 19, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 20, 2022.

Respondents

• Jennifer Cobb
• Corey Engelsdorfer
• Heather Norlock

Jennifer Cobb

1. Please identify and describe the general nature of any conflict of pecuniary interest – real or apparent, direct or indirect – that you would foresee needing to declare, given the sort of conflicts that have been disclosed by your predecessors in 2020-2022. [We later clarified the reference to 2020-2022 here. As the preamble re: “Pecuniary Conflicts of Interest” notes, these three years are the ones reported in the County’s online Annual Registries of members’ disclosoure of conflicts of interest.]

None.

2A & 3. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.” Please elaborate.

Strongly agree.

As an elected Public School Board Trustee for 12 years, the Trustee Code of Conduct has been a finite resource which has guided voting on a variety of issues. When there is a detailed, established Code of Conduct, it becomes de-personalized, so one Trustee (or Councillor) doesn’t have to ‘call out’ another. It is just another professional tool used for conducting business in an open, transparent and fair manner.

2B & 4. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.” Please elaborate.

Strongly agree.

We have many long term, extended families who have been established in the County for a long time. To place family interests over County interests should be a violation of the Councillor Code of Conduct, and so I support the definition of family to include relations beyond immediate family, to include extended family as well.

5. In the voter’s own words, please identify the most difficult-to-answer question that you’ve been asked in your campaign.

The most difficult questions I continually am asked to answer (for which I have no answer) is: Why are two people who don’t even live in Wellington/Ward 3 running to represent Wellington/Ward 3?

6. Please explain why this question was the most difficult-to-answer.

It is difficult to answer because I don’t have an answer to this. I believe that residence in the Ward should be a requirement for candidacy.

7. On October 21, 2020, Council voted unanimously to deny a rezoning application from Picton Terminals to bring in container and cruise ships. If presented with a similar vote today, how would you vote (deny or approve)? Why?

I would deny this request. The entire County already has a huge backlog of issues that haven’t been fully researched. We don’t understand the long term environmental and social effects of most of what is currently defined as an ‘issue’. Until we can develop a slow-moving, cohesive, and soundly planned out development plan for the entire County, we need to halt decisions which could potentially have a disastrous effect on the County, in part or whole, and its natural resources and environment.

---

Corey Engelsdorfer

1. Please identify and describe the general nature of any conflict of pecuniary interest – real or apparent, direct or indirect – that you would foresee needing to declare, given the sort of conflicts that have been disclosed by your predecessors in 2020-2022. [We later clarified the reference to 2020-2022 here. As the preamble re: “Pecuniary Conflicts of Interest” notes, these three years are the ones reported in the County’s online Annual Registries of members’ disclosoure of conflicts of interest.]

Advertising: As owner of The Times, there could be a pecuniary interest when it comes to advertising. If council has any say on County advertising and where it gets placed and how often, I would have to declare an interest as I would profit from it.

This one might be more of a reach, but there could be a conflict of interested on advertising from developers. If a developer advertises with The Times, it could be seen as a way to make me vote a certain way. The County has an Integrity Commissioner who I would be able to work with on deciding whether a conflict of interest should be declared.

2A & 3. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.” Please elaborate.

Agree.

It’s hard to argue against a more transparent government, and this would be a big step towards that.

2B & 4. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.” Please elaborate.

Agree.

I believe council members should not participate in activities that grant, or appear to grant, any special consideration or advantage to a family member which is not available to every other individual. I could see this being an issue with County tenders, employment, or the Grant process.

5. In the voter’s own words, please identify the most difficult-to-answer question that you’ve been asked in your campaign.

It’s been both a question and a comment: How do we stop future development?
And we don’t want anymore development in Wellington.

6. Please explain why this question was the most difficult-to-answer.

It’s hard to answer because the reality is we need development, but it is hard to convince a resident who doesn’t want it.

One key issue that relates to Wellington includes urban sprawl and development north of the village. Growth is coming. I will work to ensure the pace of this growth is managed and the design of the communities fit with the existing village. I will also advocate that the Secondary Plan be enforced and that Belleville Road not turn into a maze of stripmalls, pulling commercial out of downtown.

7. On October 21, 2020, Council voted unanimously to deny a rezoning application from Picton Terminals to bring in container and cruise ships. If presented with a similar vote today, how would you vote (deny or approve)? Why?

Deny. The environmental impacts far outweigh the tourism benefit.

---

Heather Norlock

1. Please identify and describe the general nature of any conflict of pecuniary interest – real or apparent, direct or indirect – that you would foresee needing to declare, given the sort of conflicts that have been disclosed by your predecessors in 2020-2022. [We later clarified the reference to 2020-2022 here. As the preamble re: “Pecuniary Conflicts of Interest” notes, these three years are the ones reported in the County’s online Annual Registries of members’ disclosoure of conflicts of interest.]

If I understand the question correctly, I do not see myself needing to declare any conflicts of interest. Should a family member come to council with something that would qualify I would act with honesty and transparency.

2A & 3. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.” Please elaborate.

Strongly agree.

The councillor should always advocate on the best interest of the ward as a whole. Any conflict of interest should be told to maintain transparency.

2B & 4. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.” Please elaborate.

Strongly agree.

Filling out a form to advise all on the conflict of interest would be necessary.

5. In the voter’s own words, please identify the most difficult-to-answer question that you’ve been asked in your campaign.

As of right now I have not received a question I could not answer. Some have taken further research and to develop a full understanding, but I have always made sure to come back with an answer.

6. Please explain why this question was the most difficult-to-answer.

N/A.

7. On October 21, 2020, Council voted unanimously to deny a rezoning application from Picton Terminals to bring in container and cruise ships. If presented with a similar vote today, how would you vote (deny or approve)? Why?

I would deny, as I believe more studies would need to be done on the Marina and surrounding areas, including aquatic and environmental. I would want to see data from studies of neighbours, nearby businesses, and other users to determine public opinion.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 3

Candidates received Invitation 3 on September 7, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 12, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 14, 2022.

Respondents

• Jennifer Cobb
• Corey Engelsdorfer
• Heather Norlock

Jennifer Cobb

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following strategic initiatives:

Strategic Initiative	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
By-law and policy review
Downtown revitalization
Healthcare initiatives
Municipal Accommodation Tax
PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
Short-Term Accommodations
Tourism management
Understanding Growth and Water/wastewater infrastructure

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

Short-Term Accommodations
I find it infuriating that Council spent money on a consultant who brought a variety of best practices from similar sized communities to ours regarding their management of STA’s forward, but then elected to ignore the advice of the consultant. It often appears that whoever speaks the loudest, and most forcefully, can sway Council’s decisions.

PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
We have had a desperate lack of affordable housing for many years, and yet the initiative is slow moving and hasn’t made any progress. The old arena in Wellington has sat derelict for a decade, and should have been turned into affordable housing years ago.

3. Please outline one County-wide strategic initiative that is missing from the above and should be adopted by Council.

Environment
We should have a far more comprehensive environmental initiative. Our tree canopy is dwindling, we have faced regular and persistent flooding, and have experienced a variety of climate related storms and damage.

Climate change is something that affects us all, not just we humans, but our land, our water, our homes, our agricultural sector, animals and our communities.

We need to have an overarching theme that cohesively guides our identity, policies, procedures, and practices. If we were to become a ‘Green’ community, or an ‘Environmental’ community, it would affect how we do planning and development, guide our tourism practices, improve our waste management practices, and entirely change how we promote the County. An ‘Environmental’ County is not one to be consumed, but to be preserved; not developed but enhanced; not ruined but protected.

With a widespread Environmental policy, we would limit the proliferation of signage, slow down traffic, promote walking, hiking, cycling and paddling; preserve our healthy communities, neighbourhoods and villages; and promote something that benefits us all. Environmentally sound practices could guide every one of the previously mentioned Strategic Initiatives, and be the theme that unites the work of Council across the expanse of these varied issues, promoting a livible community not just now, but long into the future.

An environmental County promotes our natural assets – parks, wetlands, the great Lake Ontario, West Lake and East Lake, and targets environmental tourism and tourists.

As one of the most ecologically diverse areas in all of Ontario, we have a great wealth of beauty, nature, diversity and wonder to share. Let us adopt an official ‘environmental’ status and let it guide how we do business in every other area, moving from knee jerk actions to a coordinated philosophy of ecological preservation and environmental sensitivity, which could guide us reliably and beautifully into the future.

---

Corey Engelsdorfer

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following strategic initiatives:

Strategic Initiative	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
By-law and policy review
Downtown revitalization
Healthcare initiatives
Municipal Accommodation Tax
PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
Short-Term Accommodations
Tourism management
Understanding Growth and Water/wastewater infrastructure

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

Tourism Management
I feel that some management was needed, but I do think that what was put in place was a bit of an overreach. The County was struggling after a crazy COVID summer in 2020. I feel council reacted, and a bit harshly. This summer has shown that tourism has slowed quite a bit allowing for a return to normal. I think a lot of the policy that was put in place was not needed. Especially the $400 fines for non-residents, or the Wellington Beach Pass. I am not a huge fan of playing the “us” vs “them” game.

Growth and Waterworks
We talk about it a lot in the pages of The Times. We have known that the County, specifically Wellington has been expecting growth for decades. It wasn’t planned for properly, and we are now going down the path of spending $100,000,000 on new waterworks features without a guarantee of the growth coming to fruition. There are apparentl up front financing agreements but the public and ratepayers haven’t seen them. I worry that if the growth doesn’t come, then waterworks users will be stuck footing the bill.

3. Please outline one County-wide strategic initiative that is missing from the above and should be adopted by Council.

Transparent Government
I believe one of the most common strategic initiatives should be a Transparent Government.

---

Heather Norlock

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following strategic initiatives:

Strategic Initiative	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
By-law and policy review
Downtown revitalization
Healthcare initiatives
Municipal Accommodation Tax
PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
Short-Term Accommodations
Tourism management
Understanding Growth and Water/wastewater infrastructure

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

Healthcare initiatives
PEC is in desperate need of doctors, there needs to be immediate effort in finding doctors enticing them to stay here.

PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
After attending the affordable housing meeting, I believe we are moving in the right direction.

3. Please outline one County-wide strategic initiative that is missing from the above and should be adopted by Council.

Roads
A County-wide strategic initiative that should be adopted by Council is road studies.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 2

Candidates received Invitation 2 on August 31, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 6, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 7, 2022.

Respondents

• Jennifer Cobb
• Corey Engelsdorfer

Jennifer Cobb

1. Please identify two internal and one external committee or board listed above whose areas of municipal responsibility would showcase your skills and interests in municipal government.

1. Audit Committee
2. Heritage Advisory Committee
3. Quinte Conservation Executive Board

2. For these three committees or boards, please highlight your skills and experience (work, volunteer, life) in those areas of municipal responsibility.
3. For these three committees or boards, please describe the impact you’d hope to make in those areas of municipal responsibility.

Audit Committee
I have been a member of HPEDSB’s Audit Committee for 9 years, and its Chair for the past 5 years. I have received training in, and learned a lot about, Public Sector Accounting Practices, Audit Committee liability, fiduciary responsibility, and how to read an Audited statement in order to present financial information in a transparent manner so that all stakeholders can understand it.

The impact I would hope to have is to increase my constituents understanding of the Corporation’s financial situation, and help them to feel assured that public funds are being used responsibly and to the best of Council’s ability.

Heritage Advisory Committee
As a long-time resident on Main Street in Wellington I live in the proposed Heritage Designation District. As a self employed person I have used the historic Wellington Town Hall for 17 years to offer classes on a weekly basis. I currently hold classes in the newly renovated Wellington Heritage Museum.

As a long term member of the Wellington Recreation Committee, and a member of the Friends of Wellington Town Hall Committee, I understand the difficulty and expense involved in the maintenance of our historic asset properties. And, I have seen the tides of change in Wellington, and understand that history helps to determine our future.

The impact I would hope to have on the Heritage Advisory Committee is to carry multiple stakeholder voices, needs and opinions forward to the Committee so that it is as fully informed as possible when making decisions which affect Wellington residents, residences, businesses and public assets, and to attest to the success of investing in our public assets, which are heritage properties, and increasing their financial viability as community resources, gathering places and community icons.

Quinte Conservation Executive Board
I am a lifelong outdoors woman, a ‘leave no trace’ back-country camper, hiker, paddler and adventurer. I have enjoyed a multitude of Quinte Conservation properties, and as an environmentalist, I have a vested interest in preserving and maintaining these natural spaces.

I have been a member, supporter or fundraiser of: Friends of Hillier Beaches and Dunes, South Shore Joint Initiative, the Millennium Trail Committee, Eastern Ontario Trails Association and Outdoor Adventurers Club.

The impact I would hope to have on the Quinte Conservation Executive Board is to add to the diverse voices, experiences and skills on the Executive. As a County resident I would carry the voices and concerns of County residents into that forum, and contribute to the conversation on conservation.

4. How would you account for these rates of voter turnout in the County in recent municipal elections?

I believe that not feeling heard, not being adequately informed, not having clear, complete and transparent information, and not feeling valued, has produce a great level of disconnection from the electoral process. Many people express a frustration with the limited sphere of choice in candidates, and that they have felt ‘what’s the use’, ‘none of these people represent me, or my politics’. There is also a general feeling of ‘they say one thing to get into office, then they change their tune’.

Here in Wellington, Ward 3, our demographics are somewhat different from other parts of the County. We are a community with more elders, people who have lots of experience. Many of them are retired, and have are active, interested and involved in the community. Community involvement often fosters a sense of community pride, and this translates to increased voter rates.

5. Please relate an occasion when you (nearly) decided not to vote in an election.

While I have never neglected my responsibility to vote, I have on many occasions wondered if there was a candidate who would actually act as my ‘elected representative’. Too often I have found that candidates seek to gain office, but then fail to actually ‘represent’ their constituents. It has many times left me feeling jaded both by candidates and the so-called ‘representational’ government system. I have heard this sentiment reflected by many people who also feel they are not being ‘represented’. In part, this is why I have declared my intention to stand for Council. I seek to be a conduit of open and transparent communication between the Corporation of the County of Prince Edward, and the Wellington, Ward 3 constituents. By engaging open, transparent and consistent communication, I seek to enable more constituents to feel engaged, heard and involved in municipal government.

6. How would you propose to work with other candidates to increase voter turnout in the County in the upcoming municipal election?

I have reached out to other candidates and offered to share everything I know about campaigning with them. I have had three fruitful sessions with other candidates, and feel a spirit of collaboration and communication has been forged.

Encouraging other candidates to campaign door-to-door is encouraging them to more directly meet, speak and listen to, their potential constituents. This practice encourages increased voter turn out by creating engaged and informed voters.

In addition to the three candidates I have met with, I have reached out to two more, and offered whatever help I can provide. It is important to me to encourage greater diversity in candidates.

---

Corey Engelsdorfer

1. Please identify two internal and one external committee or board listed above whose areas of municipal responsibility would showcase your skills and interests in municipal government.

1. Heritage Advisory Committee
2. Community & Economic Development Commission
3. Quinte Waste Solutions

2. For these three committees or boards, please highlight your skills and experience (work, volunteer, life) in those areas of municipal responsibility.

The only true experience I have on these are from following the meetings and writing about them in The Times.

3. For these three committees or boards, please describe the impact you’d hope to make in those areas of municipal responsibility.

Heritage Advisory Committee
As a lifelong County resident, I am very interested in preserving our natural heritage.

Community & Economic Development Commission
As a business owner in the County, I have a vested interest in the economic development of the community. I believe it is a positive to have business owners on this committee.

Quinte Waste Solutions
From following trash bash the past few years, it is clear we have an issue with garbage and recycling ending up on our roadsides. I think there is opportunity for public awareness, as well as pilot programs that could be run to help with this issue.

4. How would you account for these rates of voter turnout in the County in recent municipal elections?

A few reasons:

1. I believe a lot of eligible voters believe their vote won’t make a difference. I have heard “they just do what they want too anyway” an awful lot.
2. I believe there are some that aren’t interested in municipal politics. They live their daily lives, and pay their tax bills and water bills. It’s just a part of life to them. I relate this to publishing The Times. We cover a lot of municipal issues but often receive little response.
3. Easy access to voting. As a person with a young family, life can sometimes be hectic. I think it might be a benefit to make voting easier (online).

5. Please relate an occasion when you (nearly) decided not to vote in an election.

In the recent Provincial Election. It was already a hectic day and we had to get two young kids and a baby ready, packed and in the car, and then entertain them while we voted. When we arrived to our polling station we were told we were at the incorrect one and had to visit two more before finally finding the correct location. It was a somewhat stressful outing.

6. How would you propose to work with other candidates to increase voter turnout in the County in the upcoming municipal election?

I believe there needs to be better engagement. Reminding eligible voters that they can vote and that their vote does make a difference while campaigning.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 1

Candidates received Invitation 1 on August 24, 2022 and were asked to share their thoughts by August 29, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on August 31, 2022.

Respondents

• Corey Engelsdorfer
• Heather Norlock

Corey Engelsdorfer

1. How long have you resided in the County?

I was born in 1986 and lived in Wellington from then until 2004, when I left for college but would still return each summer for employment. I graduated from Durham College in 2007 and took a job in Oakville with Metroland from 2007-2010. After that time I moved back to the County and have lived here since.

1b. (Additional question for candidates for Ward Councilor only): How long have you resided in the Ward in which you are running to be Councilor?

I lived in Wellington Ward until July of 2020. I currently reside in Ameliasburgh Ward, but my business office and day-to-day life revolves around Wellington. My kids also attend school at CML Snider in Wellington.

2. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the current term of Council (Fall 2018 – present).

Past Chair of the Wellington Recreation Committee. Current Vice Chair of The Wellington Recreation Committee. Member of the Wellington Waterfront Task Team.

3. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the previous term of Council (Fall 2014 – Fall 2018).

None.

4. Please identify your membership or volunteering in a not-for-profit, non-governmental organization associated with the County during the current term of Council (November 2018 – present).

None.

5. How do you understand talk of tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County?

I am not quite sure what qualifies someone as an old resident and a new resident. Spending time on issues of old and new residents only draws away from the issues that affect each and every taxpayer in the County.

Please indicate your agreement with the following statements:

6a. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s agenda. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

6b. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s decisions. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

Unfortunately, I can’t make an assumption whether this did influence the decisions of council.

7. Please identify any role you see yourself in addressing any tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County.

I found this question quite polarizing and divisive. I believe Prince Edward County should foster an environment for all, whether they be “new” residents or “old” residents. I often explain to folks that the County wouldn’t have the economy or tax base it currently has without new residents. There are plenty of smaller town across Ontario who didn’t market themselves and accept change, and they are ghost towns now. Is that what some really want for the County?

---

Heather Norlock

1. How long have you resided in the County?

I have lived in the County my entire life.

1b. (Additional question for candidates for Ward Councilor only): How long have you resided in the Ward in which you are running to be Councilor?

I lived in Wellington my entire childhood. I moved just North of Wellington on County Road 2 many years ago and am now in the process of buying my family home from my mom so that I can stay here forever.

2. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the current term of Council (Fall 2018 – present).

I am running for Wellington Ward Councillor.

3. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the previous term of Council (Fall 2014 – Fall 2018).

None.

4. Please identify your membership or volunteering in a not-for-profit, non-governmental organization associated with the County during the current term of Council (November 2018 – present).

None.

5. How do you understand talk of tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County?

If I understand this question correctly, I do understand the tension as we have seen such dramatic growth over the last few years. This has become overwhelming for some lifetime residents. Many locals feel they can no longer live here anymore due to changes.

Please indicate your agreement with the following statements:

6a. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s agenda. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

6b. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s decisions. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

7. Please identify any role you see yourself in addressing any tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County.

As a lifetime local resident, I would act as a mediator between the concerns of “old” and “new” residents. I would educate all parties and try to validate all feelings and try to come up with a full understanding of all sides, in the hope to create a workable relationship with mutual respect.

---

Back to top

---

RSVPs

With the aim of increasing voter turnout in the upcoming municipal election, candidates for Mayor and Ward Councilor in Prince Edward County were invited to share their thoughts on a wide range of issues once a week.

Responses from candidates for Ward 4 – Ameliasburgh are here:

• Responses to Invitation 8
• Accountability & transparency
• Responses to Invitation 7
• Responses to Invitation 6
• Responses to Invitation 5
• Responses to Invitation 4
• Responses to Invitation 3
• Responses to Invitation 2
• Responses to Invitation 1

Respondents

	Invitations
Candidates for Ward 4 – Ameliasburgh (3 offices)	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Paul BOYD
Sam GROSSO
Janice MAYNARD
Roy PENNELL
Bill TKACH

Responses to Invitation 8

Candidates received Invitation 8 on October 5, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 17, 2022. Candidates who wanted their responses to be published before advance voting started were to forward them by October 12, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook beginning October 13, 2022.

Respondents

• Paul Boyd
• Bill Tkach

Paul Boyd

1. Please share how you would enhance Council’s approach to public engagement.

Not sure how this has worked. Door knocking has told me not many use it and those that do get no reaction.

2. Please share why you’re running and why voters should support you in the municipal election.

I seem to be the only candidate next to Pennell that is concerned about spending and debt.

Others have cute slogans like “building community together” grammatically incorrect but what does it mean?

How long does it take to build a hospital? Improving roads … that is a joke The county does not know how to build or fix a road.

Affordable housing. 10 years talking about the old Wellington arena and nothing has been done.

30 employees for the county make over 100 thousand dollars a year.

What would the director of Care do or a planning coordinator?

Things are out of control and no one seems concerned.

---

Bill Tkach

1. Please share how you would enhance Council’s approach to public engagement.

By being accessible. To expand, as no one is available 24/7, set expectations or goals on returning a phone call or email. Example, “I will return your email within 24 hours”. And if I am unavailable, ensuring that the automatic email reply or voicemail message indicates the length of unavailability and the return time.

2. Please share why you’re running and why voters should support you in the municipal election.

Why am I running for council?
The short answer is to give back to a place that has so warmly welcomed my family and the place we all proudly call home, The County. The longer answer? My wife’s family is in Ottawa and Kingston and when we visited them, we always tried to visit The County. After numerous enjoyable visits throughout the years, circumstance afforded us the opportunity for my wife Sharon and I to move here permanently in the spring of 2013.

Earlier this year I retired after spending more than 25 years in the financial industry as a sales executive, and now that I have the time, I believe the best way for me to give back is to run for council. I have always been interested in politics and feel that the varied experience I have gained throughout my career will allow me to address the issues of The County by bringing a new and challenging insight to council. The County’s vibrant growth needs clear and effective management to ensure it is beneficial to both ‘old’ and ‘new’ residents.

Over the years I have dealt with a diverse sales force, worked with outside vendors, continuously delivered on targets all the while maintaining budgets.

Why should voters support me?
I think one of my biggest attributes is the fact that I am not a politician. What I’ll bring to council is a “get things done” attitude and I feel that my innovative thinking and ability to use common sense to make rational decisions will be a benefit to the constituents of Ameliasburgh and The County.

I hope that I will represent Ward Four on council and I urge all to make sure that they vote. Advanced voting is available at the Ameliasburgh Town Hall from 10:00 AM to 4:00PM on October 15th, election day is October 24th from 10:00 AM to 8:00 PM and internet voting is available from 10:00 AM October 15th to 8:00 PM on October 24th.

---

Back to top

Accountability & transparency

Three Invitations asked candidates to rate six proposals to enhance Council’s accountability and transparency:

• Invitation 4 – Additional conflicts of interest (2 proposals)
• Invitation 5 – Transparency and privacy (3 proposals)
• Invitation 7 – Recorded votes (1 proposal)

We have categorized candidates’ ratings of these proposals [Not in favour | Neither | In favour] below. Candidates were also asked to explain their ratings and we encourage everyone to consider their ratings alongside their explanations.

Table 1. Candidates’ ratings of proposals to enhance Council’s accountability and transparency.

Paul BOYD
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Sam GROSSO
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Janice MAYNARD
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Roy PENNELL
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.
Bill TKACH
Proposition	Not in favour	Neither	In favour
1. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.
2. A Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.
3. A public register of requests for County records.
4. The routine disclosure of County records.
5. The active dissemination of County records.
6. A Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 7

Candidates received Invitation 7 on October 3, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 11, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on October 12, 2022.

Respondents

• Paul Boyd

Paul Boyd

1. For any one of [the nine themes covered in the 2022 VitalSigns Report], please outline a course of action that Council should consider to reinforce successes and/or address challenges identified in the 2022 VitalSigns Report.

Good health and well-being
Councillors should concentrate on the above rather than statues and parking. How many years to build a hospital? All these meetings in Toronto with 450 other municipalities seems hard to believe that a minister has the time to meet.

2. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following proposal: “Council should adopt a Procedure By-law that requires that all members’ votes on motions be recorded.”

Neither disagree or agree.

3. Please explain your rating.

If a councillor feels strongly about a motion and wants all to know how how they voted then do it.

4. Please share examples of how you’ve been trying to learn more about diversity, equity and inclusion. What have been the biggest changes in your thinking? How are you applying what you’ve learned in your work in the County?

Diversity equity and inclusion. The above really means “shut up”. The left doesn’t want equality It is a terrible pursuit. Inclusive and diversity might be fine but we have to balance that without violating peoples individuals rights.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 6

Candidates received Invitation 6 on September 23, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by October 3, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on October 5, 2022.

Respondents

• Paul Boyd

Paul Boyd

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following service categories:

Service category	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
General government
Protection services
Transportation services
Environmental services
Health services
Social and family services
Social housing
Recreation and cultural services
Planning and development services

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

General government
Hard to do business (thank goodness for [Name] and [Name]). Get answers. Complain. Attend local issues and resolve. Roads. Fire department.

Social and family services
Homeless. Talked about in Wellington for 8 years and nothing done except an executive director.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 5

Candidates received Invitation 5 on September 20, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 26, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 28, 2022.

Respondents

• Bill Tkach

Bill Tkach

1. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following:

“Council should adopt a Strategic Initiative to respond to [the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s] Calls to Action 43, 47 and 57.”

Neither disagree or agree.

2. Please explain your rating.

I neither agree or disagree because I do not have an opinion on the initiatives as I find it hard to believe that they are not already in place or at least have the information available.

3. Please rate your level of agreement (Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree) with the following statements:

“The cost of maintaining a public register of requests for County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Agree.

“The cost of the routine disclosure of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Agree.

“The cost of the active dissemination of County records would likely outweigh its benefits.”
Agree.

4. For any one of your ratings above, please describe your analysis of the different costs and benefits that lead to your conclusion (max. 500 words).

If there are an overwhelming number of such requests, then I think then the County should investigate creating routine disclosures. My opinion of keeping things simple still holds true, sometimes less policing can be better and more efficient.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 4

Candidates received Invitation 4 on September 14, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 19, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 20, 2022.

Respondents

• Paul Boyd
• Bill Tkach

Paul Boyd

1. Please identify and describe the general nature of any conflict of pecuniary interest – real or apparent, direct or indirect – that you would foresee needing to declare, given the sort of conflicts that have been disclosed by your predecessors in 2020-2022. [We later clarified the reference to 2020-2022 here. As the preamble re: “Pecuniary Conflicts of Interest” notes, these three years are the ones reported in the County’s online Annual Registries of members’ disclosoure of conflicts of interest.]

None.

2A & 3. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.” Please elaborate.

Strongly agree.

Should be open on any or all perceived conflict.

2B & 4. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.” Please elaborate.

Strongly agree.

As above.

5. In the voter’s own words, please identify the most difficult-to-answer question that you’ve been asked in your campaign.

Affordable housing.

6. Please explain why this question was the most difficult-to-answer.

Not possible in this county unless taxpayers want to pay the bill for a huge expense.

7. On October 21, 2020, Council voted unanimously to deny a rezoning application from Picton Terminals to bring in container and cruise ships. If presented with a similar vote today, how would you vote (deny or approve)? Why?

Would approve. Why do we always give job creating opportunities a hard time?

---

Bill Tkach

1. Please identify and describe the general nature of any conflict of pecuniary interest – real or apparent, direct or indirect – that you would foresee needing to declare, given the sort of conflicts that have been disclosed by your predecessors in 2020-2022. [We later clarified the reference to 2020-2022 here. As the preamble re: “Pecuniary Conflicts of Interest” notes, these three years are the ones reported in the County’s online Annual Registries of members’ disclosoure of conflicts of interest.]

My wife and I own a small vineyard. We currently sell our grapes to local wineries.

2A & 3. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses non-pecuniary conflicts of interests.” Please elaborate.

Disagree.

I agree that we need certain controls, however, coming from the financial world where compliance and codes of conduct were plentiful, I answered I disagree because too much of it can put a strangle hold on progress or in our case, making decisions.

2B & 4. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement: “The County should adopt a Council Code of Conduct that addresses the pecuniary conflicts of interests of a family member who is not a parent, spouse or child.” Please elaborate.

Disagree.

Where do we draw the line on who to include and who not to include. Keep it simple and transparent, if my decision or vote has a direct impact pecuniary or non, I should excuse myself from the vote.

5. In the voter’s own words, please identify the most difficult-to-answer question that you’ve been asked in your campaign.

I haven’t been asked a difficult to answer question, other than number 7 below.

6. Please explain why this question was the most difficult-to-answer.

[See below]

7. On October 21, 2020, Council voted unanimously to deny a rezoning application from Picton Terminals to bring in container and cruise ships. If presented with a similar vote today, how would you vote (deny or approve)? Why?

Without understanding the benefits or detriments, I cannot give a yes or no answer. I know that tourism is a big part of The County and cruise ships would add visitors. That said, if we don’t have the manpower to service these visitors, it all goes for naught.

---

Back to top

Responses to Invitation 3

Candidates received Invitation 3 on September 7, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 12, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 14, 2022.

Respondents

• Paul Boyd
• Bill Tkach

Paul Boyd

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following strategic initiatives:

Strategic Initiative	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
By-law and policy review
Downtown revitalization
Healthcare initiatives
Municipal Accommodation Tax
PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
Short-Term Accommodations
Tourism management
Understanding Growth and Water/wastewater infrastructure

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
8 years ago they talked about this. Should have torn down the old arena in Wellington and developed the abandoned schools in Bloomfield and Picton. What did they do … hired another Executive Director. There is no affordable housing in the county.

Understanding growth and water/wastewater infrastructure
Poor planning. Sorry for the ones who have to pay. So I would say that I am disappointed.

3. Please outline one County-wide strategic initiative that is missing from the above and should be adopted by Council.

Homelessness
Homeless people in THIS county. We should be ashamed.

---

Bill Tkach

1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with each of the following strategic initiatives:

Strategic Initiative	Very dissatisfied	Dissatisfied	Neither	Satisfied	Very satisfied
By-law and policy review
Downtown revitalization
Healthcare initiatives
Municipal Accommodation Tax
PEC Affordable Housing Corp.
Short-Term Accommodations
Tourism management
Understanding Growth and Water/wastewater infrastructure

2. Please explain two of your ratings.

If I can be frank, my “neither dissatisfied nor satisfied” response to many initiatives is a result of not being personally affected by them. I believe the role of council is to collect the information, understand it and create the initiatives. My rating their efforts would be unqualified at the present time. These strategic initiatives are very important to the development of The County and if their progress isn’t moving quickly enough for constituents, then it may be time to bring new, fresh voices to council.

By-law and policy review
I have read many developments and/or decisions reported in our local papers and my first reaction was that there is a basic logic missing from decisions. We cannot stop the vibrant growth in The County, nor should we want to. What we need is to provide clear and effective management to ensure benefit to both the “old” and the “new”.

Healthcare initiatives
Steps have been taking with the hiring of a doctor recruiter and kudos for a step in the right direction. As someone who’s doctor retired 4 years ago, I have a personal interest. In speaking with a representative from Ontario Health Care Connect, one new family doctor in The County would relieve the current backlog we are faced with. The task isn’t monumental.

3. Please outline one County-wide strategic initiative that is missing from the above and should be adopted by Council.

Going back to being frank and transparent, I cannot outline a strategic initiative that is missing. My answer is two-fold; first, I retired recently from my career in the financial industry which held a majority off my focus and second, I have not spoken with enough of my constituents to learn all their issues and concerns.

---

Back to top

Invitation 2

Candidates received Invitation 2 on August 31, 2022 and were asked to forward their responses by September 6, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on September 7, 2022.

Respondents

• Paul Boyd
• Bill Tkach

Paul Boyd

1. Please identify two internal and one external committee or board listed above whose areas of municipal responsibility would showcase your skills and interests in municipal government.

1. Heritage Advisory Committee
2. Planning Committee
3. Quinte Waste Solutions

2. For these three committees or boards, please highlight your skills and experience (work, volunteer, life) in those areas of municipal responsibility.
3. For these three committees or boards, please describe the impact you’d hope to make in those areas of municipal responsibility.

Heritage Advisory Committee
I was formerly chairman of both the county and the Ameliasburgh Museum Boards. Impact: Make sure our history both physically and verbally are not erased by the few who try to rewrite the past.

Planning Committee
Good planning is required and I was on the planning board in ameliasburgh and we had an approved official plan long before any rural municipality including the county had one. Impact: Quick response for development with good intentions. Save farmland from disappearing. Develop within the existing hamlets and towns with existing services.

Quinte Waste Solutions
Instrumental in buying for Ameliasburgh the present waste site so we would have a controlled solution for all refuse in the township. Impact: Make sure we don’t make mistakes in our waste policy so we end up having to buy our way out of disposing.

4. How would you account for these rates of voter turnout in the County in recent municipal elections?

Lack of interest. Never hear from a councillor for 4 years. The ones who don’t vote if confronted will say don’t blame me I didn’t vote for the gang who have made a mess and raising taxes every year.

5. Please relate an occasion when you (nearly) decided not to vote in an election.

Never.

6. How would you propose to work with other candidates to increase voter turnout in the County in the upcoming municipal election?

Candidates only want to get more votes than me to get elected. I think in North and South Marysburgh you can get elected with 300 votes. In Ameliasburgh you need 1000. I have never seen an ad saying get out and vote.

---

Bill Tkach

1. Please identify two internal and one external committee or board listed above whose areas of municipal responsibility would showcase your skills and interests in municipal government.

1. Audit Committee
2. Traffic Committee
3. Prince Edward County Affordable Housing Corporation

2. For these three committees or boards, please highlight your skills and experience (work, volunteer, life) in those areas of municipal responsibility.

Audit Committee
I will bring 25 plus years in the financial industry to the committee. I have managed forecasting, budgets and costs while understanding the need for focussed spending.

Traffic Committee
I have planned, developed, managed and executed national sales strategies and can bring this ability to logically review the information and offer solutions to complex problems.

Prince Edward County Affordable Housing Corporation
There is vibrant growth in The County, and it requires clear, effective management. I would rely on the negotiating skills I possess to work with developers to create affordable housing.

3. For these three committees or boards, please describe the impact you’d hope to make in those areas of municipal responsibility.

I would hope that my innovative thinking and ability to use common sense to make timely, rational decisions would have an impact on the committees.

4. How would you account for these rates of voter turnout in the County in recent municipal elections?

I think the problem may be two-fold – first, voters may not know the importance of municipal government or the role that it plays; second, and sadly, voters may feel it is the sale old, same old and that nothing really changes, and their vote does not have any affect.

5. Please relate an occasion when you (nearly) decided not to vote in an election.

I have always voted. Not only is it a civic duty, but I’ve also always believed that if you do not vote, your voice cannot be heard.

6. How would you propose to work with other candidates to increase voter turnout in the County in the upcoming municipal election?

We could provide more information through various venues; your websites are good examples; printed material in our local papers is another. The County could advertise upcoming elections with signs. And as elected officials it is our responsibility to make a difference, demonstrating that their votes do make a difference.

---

Back to top

Invitation 1

Candidates received Invitation 1 on August 24, 2022 and were asked to share their thoughts by August 29, 2022. Candidate responses were published here and on Facebook on August 31, 2022.

Respondents

• Paul Boyd
• Bill Tkach

Paul Boyd

1. How long have you resided in the County?

Since 1962.

1b. (Additional question for candidates for Ward Councilor only): How long have you resided in the Ward in which you are running to be Councilor?

Since 1962.

2. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the current term of Council (Fall 2018 – present).

NA.

3. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the previous term of Council (Fall 2014 – Fall 2018).

NA.

4. Please identify your membership or volunteering in a not-for-profit, non-governmental organization associated with the County during the current term of Council (November 2018 – present).

None.

5. How do you understand talk of tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County?

Not aware of any in my circle of friends or people met.

Please indicate your agreement with the following statements:

6a. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s agenda. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

6b. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s decisions. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

7. Please identify any role you see yourself in addressing any tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County.

If any I am a good mediator experience from my job.

---

Bill Tkach

1. How long have you resided in the County?

This is my 10th summer. My wife and I moved to The County in June 2013.

1b. (Additional question for candidates for Ward Councilor only): How long have you resided in the Ward in which you are running to be Councilor?

Since June 2013.

2. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the current term of Council (Fall 2018 – present).

Brand new to politics, recently retired from the financial industry.

3. Please identify your membership on Council, committee, commission, board, or other body associated with the municipal government in the County during the previous term of Council (Fall 2014 – Fall 2018).

None.

4. Please identify your membership or volunteering in a not-for-profit, non-governmental oganization associated with the County during the current term of Council (November 2018 – present).

None.

5. How do you understand talk of tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County?

Perhaps I may be fortunate, I haven’t experienced tension with “old” residents.

Please indicate your agreement with the following statements:

6a. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s agenda. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

6b. Tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County influences Council’s decisions. [Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither disagree or agree | Agree | Strongly agree]

7. Please identify any role you see yourself in addressing any tension between “old” and “new” residents in the County.

Having not experienced tension between “old” and “new” it is difficult to identify a role. I would hope that personal experiences in my career will afford me the opportunity to mediate such circumstances.

---

Back to top